Comparison of four methods for measuring total suction

被引:78
作者
Agus, SS [1 ]
Schanz, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Bauhaus Univ Weimar, Lab Soil Mech, D-99421 Weimar, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.2136/vzj2004.0133
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study assessed four methods for measuring soil total suction in laboratory: the noncontact filter paper method, the psychrometer technique, the relative humidity ( RH) sensor, and the chilled- mirror hygrometer technique. Our aim in this study was to compare the four total suction measurement techniques, especially the psychrometer method and the RH sensor, which may be used for field total suction measurements. While field application of the sensors is the eventual concern, no field measurements were performed in the study. Assessment was made using two bentonite - sand mixtures, which can be used as clay liner for landfills. A discussion of factors influencing measurement accuracy is also provided. The chilled- mirror hygrometer technique appears to give the most accurate results, and therefore may used as a benchmark for assessing the accuracy of the three other methods. For the bentonite - sand mixture used in this study, the total suction measured using the noncontact filter paper technique represents values at a quasi- equilibrium state after redistribution of water in the specimen, instead of the total suction at as- compacted state. The RH sensor provided a faster response than the psychrometer technique However, the RH sensor exhibited a systematic error in the small suction range.
引用
收藏
页码:1087 / 1095
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Agus SS, 2003, GEOTECHNICAL MEASUREMENTS AND MODELLING, P315
[2]  
AITCHISON GD, 1965, IN PRESS MOISTURE EQ
[3]  
Albrecht BA, 2003, GEOTECH TEST J, V26, P3
[4]   EVALUATION OF FILTER PAPER METHOD FOR ESTIMATING SOIL-WATER POTENTIAL [J].
ALKHAFAF, S ;
HANKS, RJ .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1974, 117 (04) :194-199
[5]  
*ASTM, 1997, ANN BOOK STAND, V4
[6]   Long-term effects of cultivation on particle size and water-retention characteristics determined using wetting curves [J].
Brye, KR .
SOIL SCIENCE, 2003, 168 (07) :459-468
[7]   PSYCHROMETRIC MEASUREMENT OF SOIL WATER POTENTIAL - TEMPERATURE AND BULK DENSITY EFFECTS [J].
CAMPBELL, GS ;
GARDNER, WH .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA PROCEEDINGS, 1971, 35 (01) :8-&
[8]  
Croney D, 1961, PORE PRESSURE SUCTIO, P31
[9]   USE AND ACCURACY OF THE FILTER-PAPER TECHNIQUE FOR MEASUREMENT OF SOIL MATRIC POTENTIAL [J].
DEKA, RN ;
WAIRIU, M ;
MTAKWA, PW ;
MULLINS, CE ;
VEENENDAAL, EM ;
TOWNEND, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1995, 46 (02) :233-238
[10]  
Feng M, 2002, GEOTECH TEST J, V25, P303