Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia

被引:135
作者
Glaser, C
Marhofer, P
Zimpfer, G
Heinz, MT
Sitzwohl, C
Kapral, S
Schindler, I
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Vienna City Hosp Floridsdorf, Div Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Vienna, Austria
[3] Gersthof Orthoped Hosp, Div Anesthesiol, Vienna, Austria
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-200201000-00037
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Levobupivacaine is the pure S(-)-enantiomer of racemic bupivacaine but is less toxic to the heart and central nervous system. Although it has recently been introduced for routine obstetric and nonobstetric epidural anesthesia, comparative clinical studies on its intrathecal administration are not available. We therefore performed this prospective randomized double-blinded study to evaluate the anesthetic potencies and hemodynamics of intrathecal levobupivacaine compared with racemic bupivacaine, Eighty patients undergoing elective hip replacement received either 3.5 mL levobupivacaine 0.5% isobaric or 3.5 mL bupivacaine 0.5% isobaric. Sensory blockade was verified with the pinprick test; motor blockade was documented by using a modified Bromage score. Hemodynamic variables (e.g., blood pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry) were also recorded. Intergroup differences between levobupivacaine and bupivacaine were insignificant both with regard to the onset time and the duration of sensory and motor blockade (11 +/- 6 versus 13 +/- 8 min; 10 +/- 7 versus 9 +/- 7 min; 228 +/- 77 versus 237 +/- 88 min; 280 +/- 84 versus 284 +/- 80 min). Both groups showed slight reductions in heart rate and mean arterial pressure, but there was no intergroup difference in hemodynamics. We conclude that intrathecal levobupivacaine is equal in efficacy to, but less toxic than, racemic bupivacaine.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 198
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Clinical effects and maternal and fetal plasma concentrations of 0.5% epidural levobupivacaine versus bupivacaine for cesarean delivery [J].
Bader, AM ;
Tsen, LC ;
Camann, WR ;
Nephew, E ;
Datta, S .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (06) :1596-1601
[2]   A comparison of the cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and rac-bupivacaine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers [J].
Bardsley, H ;
Gristwood, R ;
Baker, H ;
Watson, N ;
Nimmo, W .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 46 (03) :245-249
[3]   Levobupivacaine vs bupivacaine as infiltration anaesthesia in inguinal herniorrhaphy [J].
Bay-Nielsen, M ;
Klarskov, B ;
Bech, K ;
Andersen, J ;
Kehlet, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (02) :280-282
[4]   Spinal anesthesia with 0.5% S(-)-bupivacaine for elective lower limb surgery [J].
Burke, D ;
Kennedy, S ;
Bannister, J .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 1999, 24 (06) :519-523
[5]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF THE ENANTIOMERS OF BUPIVACAINE FOLLOWING INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION OF THE RACEMATE [J].
BURM, AGL ;
VANDERMEER, AD ;
VANKLEEF, JW ;
ZEIJLMANS, PWM ;
GROEN, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 38 (02) :125-129
[6]   INCIDENCE AND RISK-FACTORS FOR SIDE-EFFECTS OF SPINAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
CARPENTER, RL ;
CAPLAN, RA ;
BROWN, DL ;
STEPHENSON, C ;
WU, R .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (06) :906-916
[7]   Comparison of S(-)-bupivacaine with racemic (RS)-bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block [J].
Cox, CR ;
Checketts, MR ;
Mackenzie, N ;
Scott, NB ;
Bannister, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 80 (05) :594-598
[8]   Extradural S(-)-bupivacaine: comparison with racemic RS-bupivacaine [J].
Cox, CR ;
Faccenda, KA ;
Gilhooly, C ;
Bannister, J ;
Scott, NB ;
Morrison, LMM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 80 (03) :289-293
[9]   Levobupivacaine - A review of its pharmacology and use as a local anaesthetic [J].
Foster, RH ;
Markham, A .
DRUGS, 2000, 59 (03) :551-579
[10]  
Gristwood R W, 1999, Expert Opin Investig Drugs, V8, P861, DOI 10.1517/13543784.8.6.861