The distribution problem in economic evaluation: income and the valuation of costs and consequences of health care programmes

被引:43
作者
Donaldson, C
Birch, S
Gafni, A
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Econ, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Ctr Hlth & Policy Studies, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ & Policy Anal, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
关键词
distribution; economic evaluation; welfare;
D O I
10.1002/hec.642
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To date, a common view in the health economics literature is that the applicability of cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is limited, due to the distribution problem which underlies its main method of valuation (e.g. willingness to pay). One view is that cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) overcomes these problems. We show that the same distributional concerns apply to non-monetary valuations of health consequences, to measurement of costs and to the decision rules of CEA. Hence adopting CEA over CBA cannot be justified on the basis of 'avoiding' distributional considerations. The implications of our results are discussed, including alternative strategies for the use of 'income-based' research findings in social decision-making. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 70
页数:16
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MICROECONOMICS
[2]   Are health states "timeless"? The case of the standard gamble method [J].
Bala, MV ;
Wood, LL ;
Zarkin, GA ;
Norton, EC ;
Gafni, A ;
O'Brien, BJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 52 (11) :1047-1053
[3]   COST-EFFECTIVENESS UTILITY ANALYSES - DO CURRENT DECISION RULES LEAD US TO WHERE WE WANT TO BE [J].
BIRCH, S ;
GAFNI, A .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1992, 11 (03) :279-296
[4]  
BIRCH S, 1991, INCENTIVES HLTH SYST, P169
[5]   QALYS AND HYES - UNDER WHAT CONDITIONS ARE THEY EQUIVALENT [J].
BLEICHRODT, H .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1995, 14 (01) :17-37
[6]   The validity of QALYs: An experimental test of constant proportional tradeoff and utility independence [J].
Bleichrodt, H ;
Johannesson, M .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1997, 17 (01) :21-32
[7]  
Boardman AE., 1996, Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice
[8]   The numeraire matters in cost-benefit analysis [J].
Brekke, KA .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1997, 64 (01) :117-123
[9]   What price information? Modelling threshold probabilities of fetal loss [J].
Cairns, J ;
Shackley, P .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (06) :823-830
[10]  
Culyer A, 1990, QUALITY LIFE PERSPEC