Risk prioritization in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis using interval type-2 fuzzy sets

被引:105
作者
Bozdag, Erhan [1 ]
Asan, Umut [1 ]
Soyer, Ayberk [1 ]
Serdarasan, Seyda [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34367 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis; Interval type-2 fuzzy sets; Uncertainty; EVIDENTIAL REASONING APPROACH; CRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; TOPSIS APPROACH; OPERATORS; 2-TUPLE; OWA;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.015
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The analysis of failure modes and their effects generally requires dealing with uncertainty and subjectivity inherent in the risk assessment process. A review of the literature reveals that although a number of studies have examined these issues, none of them have explicitly studied the variation in one expert's understanding (intra-personal uncertainty) and the variations in the understanding among experts (inter-personal uncertainty) together. To address this problem, this paper proposes a new fuzzy FMEA approach based on IT2 fuzzy sets, which has the ability to capture both intra-personal and inter-personal uncertainty. The approach introduces three methods that are new for the analysis of failure modes. First, to provide a more accurate representation of the aggregated data by preserving the variations among the individual judgments a new aggregation method is suggested. It transforms individual judgments in form of intervals into a group judgment in form of an IT2 FN. Second, to allow considering optimal weights for the risk factors and thereby developing more flexible structures for their synthesis, an a-cut based ordered weighted averaging operator is adapted. Finally, to rank failure modes on a continuous scale and reflect subtle differences in the assessments properly, a ranking method for IT2 FNs based on a-cuts is adopted. The applicability and effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated by an illustrative example. Comparisons with the results of crisp- and fuzzy-based methods demonstrate that the proposed approach offers additional flexibility to the experts in making judgments and provides a better modeling of uncertainty. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4000 / 4015
页数:16
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, J ACHIEVEMENTS MAT M
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, INT C FUZZ SYST
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Simulation modeling and analysis
[4]  
[Anonymous], 150261 ISOIEC
[5]   Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for wind turbines [J].
Arabian-Hoseynabadi, H. ;
Oraee, H. ;
Tavner, P. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2010, 32 (07) :817-824
[6]  
Asan U., INTELLIGENT IN PRESS
[7]  
Asan U., 2012, COMPUTATIONAL INTELL, P157
[8]  
Asan U., J MULTIPLE IN PRESS
[9]  
Atanassov K. T., 1936, FUZZY SETS SYSTEMS, V20, P87
[10]   Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis [J].
Braglia, M ;
Frosolini, M ;
Montanari, R .
QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 19 (05) :425-443