Integrated treatment and recycling of stormwater: a review of Australian practice

被引:104
作者
Hatt, BE [1 ]
Deletic, A [1 ]
Fletcher, TD [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Inst Sustainable Water Resources, Dept Civil Engn, Monash, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
stormwater; water recycling; water treatment; Australia;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.06.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the use of water approaching, and in some cases exceeding, the limits of sustainability in many locations, there is an increasing recognition of the need to utilise stormwater for non-potable requirements, thus reducing the demand on potable sources. This paper presents a review of Australian stormwater treatment and recycling practices as well as a discussion of key lessons and identified knowledge gaps. Where possible, recommendations for overcoming these knowledge gaps are given. The review of existing stormwater recycling systems focussed primarily on the recycling of general urban runoff (runoff generated from all urban surfaces) for non-potable purposes. Regulations and guidelines specific to stormwater recycling need to be developed to facilitate effective design of such systems, and to minimise risks of failure. There is a clear need for the development of innovative techniques for the collection, treatment and storage of stormwater. Existing stormwater recycling practice is far ahead of research, in that there are no technologies designed specifically for stormwater recycling. Instead, technologies designed for general stormwater pollution control are frequently utilised, which do not guarantee the necessary reliability of treatment. Performance modelling for evaluation purposes also needs further research, so that industry can objectively assess alternative approaches. Just as many aspects of these issues may have impeded adoption of stormwater, another impediment to adoption has been the lack of a practical and widely accepted method for assessing the many financial, social and ecological costs and benefits of stormwater recycling projects against traditional alternatives. Such triple-bottom-line assessment methodologies need to be trialled on stormwater recycling projects. If the costs and benefits of recycling systems can be shown to compare favourably with the costs and benefits of conventional practices this will provide an incentive to overcome other obstacles to widespread adoption of stormwater recycling. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 113
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   REUSE OF COLLECTED STORMWATER RUNOFF FOR IRRIGATION IN KUWAIT [J].
ALHOTI, BA ;
ABDULLAH, R .
DESALINATION, 1989, 75 (1-3) :329-340
[2]  
Anderson JM, 1996, DESALINATION, V106, P151
[3]   Catchment "greening" using stormwater in Adelaide, South Australia [J].
Argue, JR ;
Pezzaniti, D .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 39 (02) :177-183
[4]  
*ARMCANZ ANZECC NH, 2000, GUID SEW SYST US REC
[5]  
*AS NZS, 1999, 45361999 AS NZS
[6]  
Coombes P. J., 2002, URBAN WATER, V4, P307, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1462-0758(02)00028-6
[7]  
COOMBES PJ, 2002, ON SITE WATER BALANC
[8]   SQIRTS - an on-site stormwater treatment and reuse approach to sustainable water management in Sydney [J].
Dallmer, L .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 46 (6-7) :151-158
[9]  
DAVISON L, 2001, ONS 01 C ADV ONS WAS
[10]  
*DEH, 2004, INL WAT