Effect of cervical disease history on outcomes of women who have a pap diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance

Objective. To determine the relationship between history of cervical dysplasia or carcinoma and the development of cervical dysplasia or adenocarcinoma in women who have a diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS), favor endocervical origin, or AGUS, not otherwise specified. Methods. A 6-year retrospective review of the pathology files was performed for 93 women who were diagnosed in 1992 with AGUS, favor endocervical origin, or AGUS, not otherwise specified. Data collected included previous history of cervical disease, follow-up diagnoses, time interval between follow-ups, and procedures performed. Results. Of women with follow-up who had or did not have a previous history of cervical dysplasia, 32.0 and 12.0%, respectively, developed a squamous dysplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Of the women who had or did not have a previous history of cervical dysplasia and had Pap smear follow-up, only 4.2 and 4.3%, respectively, had a false-negative diagnosis on the most immediate subsequent smear. Conclusions. Women who have AGUS, favor endocervical origin, or AGUS, not otherwise specified, and no history of cervical dysplasia have a significantly lower risk of developing or having cervical dysplasia than women who have the same diagnosis and a history of cervical dysplasia. This may warrant different treatment protocols for these two groups. For the women with AGUS and no previous history of cervical dysplasia, a repeat Pap smear, rather than colposcopy with curettage, may be warranted. (C) 1999 Academic Press.