Simulating Guinea Grass Production: Empirical and Mechanistic Approaches

被引:32
作者
Araujo, Leandro C. [1 ]
Santos, Patricia M. [2 ]
Rodriguez, Daniel [3 ]
Pezzopane, Jose Ricardo M. [2 ]
Oliveira, Patricia P. A. [2 ]
Cruz, Pedro G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dep Zootecnia ESALQ, BR-13418900 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
[2] EMBRAPA Pecuaria SE, BR-13560970 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Queensland, QAAFI, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
PANICUM-MAXIMUM; NIGHT TEMPERATURE; USE EFFICIENCY; GROWTH; RADIATION; PREDICTION; MODEL; ENVIRONMENT;
D O I
10.2134/agronj2012.0245
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Tropical grasses are economically important for cattle production in Brazil, and accurate simulation models for tropical pastures can benefit forage researchers and farm managers by improving tropical forage production systems. This research calibrated and validated four modeling approaches of contrasting complexity to simulate mass production of Mombaca Guinea grass (Panicum maximum Jacq.). The models included three empirical agro-climatic models (i.e., using cumulative degree days, photothermal units, and a climatic growth index) and a biophysical simulation model, Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM)-Growth. Data sets for calibration and independent validation included frequent records of aboveground dry matter production during the 2005-2006 and 2010-2011 growing seasons from three trials. All models performed well during calibration (R-2 = 0.78-0.86; coefficient of variation = 26-32.1%). During model validation, the R-2 varied between 0.69 and 0.78, the agreement index was between 0.88 and 0.93, the coefficient of variation between 37.6 and 50.2%, and the mean bias error was between 6 and 470 kg ha(-1). Even though all models were in agreement between simulated and observed results, APSIM-Growth was able to simulate Guinea grass production across broader climatic, soil, and management (e.g., N fertilization) conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 69
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Canopy growth and development of Panicum maximum "cv" Mombaca [J].
Alexandrino, E ;
Gomide, JA ;
Gomide, CAD .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2005, 34 (06) :2164-2173
[2]  
Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[3]   Strategic and Tactial prediction of forage production in northern mixed-grass prairie [J].
Andales, Allan A. ;
Derner, Justin D. ;
Ahuja, Lajpat R. ;
Hart, Richard H. .
RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2006, 59 (06) :576-584
[4]   TEMPERATURE AFFECTS RADIATION USE EFFICIENCY IN MAIZE [J].
ANDRADE, FH ;
UHART, SA ;
CIRILO, A .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1993, 32 (1-2) :17-25
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, SOIL TAX BAS SYST SO, V2nd, pWashington
[6]  
APSIM, 2011, AGR PROD SYST SIM
[7]  
Araujo LC, 2010, J DAIRY SCI, V93, P627
[8]  
Bertolone L.E.M., 2009, THESIS STATE U SAO P
[9]   Bases and limits to using 'degree.day' units [J].
Bonhomme, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2000, 13 (01) :1-10
[10]   ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INCOMING SOLAR-RADIATION AND DAILY MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM TEMPERATURE [J].
BRISTOW, KL ;
CAMPBELL, GS .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1984, 31 (02) :159-166