Receipt of information and women's attitudes towards ultrasound scanning during pregnancy

被引:40
作者
Whynes, DK [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Econ, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
information; pregnancy; satisfaction; ultrasound;
D O I
10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00517.x
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To audit women's receipt of information during routine antenatal ultrasound investigations, and to investigate women's perceptions of, and attitudes towards, routine screening. Design Analysis of the records of 384 women from in and around Nottingham, UK, who maintained a diary throughout the course of their pregnancies. Results The mean number of ultrasound scans received by each women during her pregnancy was 2.6, with more than 96% of women receiving at least one scan. Women initially scanned earlier received more scans in total. Women appeared aware of the specific reasons for each scan being undertaken, and only a minority were dissatisfied by the information they had received. The preponderance of information received during the scans related to results and arrangements for subsequent visits, with only 10% of women reporting receiving information about the Procedure itself. Most women reported positive feelings towards scanning, and few gave indications that they would prefer changes in the conduct of the procedure. Conclusions The great majority of the women in our study were satisfied with their experiences of routine ultrasound scanning, accepting the procedure uncritically.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 12
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, CHANGING CHILDBIRTH
[2]   Gaining informed consent for screening [J].
Austoker, J .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7212) :722-723
[3]  
Bricker L, 2000, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V4, P1
[4]  
COX DN, 1987, OBSTET GYNECOL, V70, P673
[5]   Women's informed choice of prenatal diagnosis: Early ultrasound examination routine ultrasound examination age-independent amniocentesis [J].
CrangSvalenius, E ;
Dykes, AK ;
Jorgensen, C .
FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 1996, 11 (01) :20-25
[6]   Is an ultrasound assessment of gestational age at the first antenatal visit of value? A randomised clinical trial [J].
Crowther, CA ;
Kornman, L ;
O'Callaghan, S ;
George, K ;
Furness, M ;
Willson, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (12) :1273-1279
[7]   Recent changes in birth attendant, place of birth, and the use of obstetric interventions, United States, 1989-1997 [J].
Curtin, SC .
JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY, 1999, 44 (04) :349-354
[8]   Psychological impact of the announcement of a fetal abnormality on pregnant women and on professionals [J].
Detraux, JJ ;
Gillot-de Vries, F ;
Eynde, SV ;
Courtois, A ;
Desmet, A .
ULTRASOUND SCREENING FOR FETAL ANOMALIES: IS IT WORTH IT?: SCREENING REVISITED AFTER THE EUROFETUS DATA, 1998, 847 :210-219
[9]   Perception of information, expectations and experiences among women and their partners attending a second-trimester routine ultrasound scan [J].
Eurenius, K ;
Axelsson, O ;
GallstedtFransson, I ;
Sjoden, PO .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 9 (02) :86-90
[10]   MATERNAL BONDING IN EARLY FETAL ULTRASOUND EXAMINATIONS [J].
FLETCHER, JC ;
EVANS, MI .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 308 (07) :392-393