Measuring duopoly power in the British electricity spot market

被引:356
作者
Wolfram, CD [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Econ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1257/aer.89.4.805
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article presents an empirical study of market power in the British electricity industry. Estimates of price-cost markups are derived using direct measures of marginal cost and several approaches that do not rely on cost data. Since two suppliers facing inelastic demand dominate the industry, most oligopoly models predict prices substantially above marginal costs. All estimates indicate that prices, while higher than marginal costs, are not nearly as high as most theoretical models predict. Regulatory constraints, the threat of entry, and financial contracts between the suppliers and their customers are considered as possible explanations for the observed price levels. (JEL L13, L94).
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 826
页数:22
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ENERGY J, DOI [10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol14-no4-7, 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol14-No4-7]
[2]  
ARMSTRONG M, 1994, REGULATORY REFORM
[3]   NONPARAMETRIC-TESTS OF MARKET-STRUCTURE - AN APPLICATION TO THE CIGARETTE INDUSTRY [J].
ASHENFELTER, O ;
SULLIVAN, D .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1987, 35 (04) :483-498
[4]   SUPPLY FUNCTION EQUILIBRIA AND THE DANGER OF TACIT COLLUSION - THE CASE OF SPOT MARKETS FOR ELECTRICITY [J].
BOLLE, F .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1992, 14 (02) :94-102
[5]  
BORENSTEIN S, 1999, IN PRESS J IND EC
[6]  
Bresnahan T., 1989, HDB IND ORG, V2, P1010
[7]   Market power and strategic interaction in electricity networks [J].
Cardell, JB ;
Hitt, CC ;
Hogan, WW .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1997, 19 (1-2) :109-137
[8]  
*CENTR EL GEN BOAR, CEGB STAT YB
[9]   Conduct parameters and the measurement of market power [J].
Corts, KS .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1999, 88 (02) :227-250
[10]   Testing static oligopoly models: conduct and cost in the sugar industry, 1890-1914 [J].
Genesove, D ;
Mullin, WP .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 29 (02) :355-377