The role of rankings in codifying a business school template: classifications, diffusion and mediated isomorphism in organizational fields

被引:71
作者
Wedlin, Linda [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Business Studies, S-75120 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
rankings; business schools; organizational field; isomorphism; identity; template; REPUTATION; TRANSFORMATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500073
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
How are business school rankings shaping the international management education field? This paper investigates the role of classification mechanisms such as rankings in forming organizational fields, and asks to what extent rankings are influencing organizations to become more alike. Using a qualitative study of European business schools and their responses to international rankings, I show how the rankings are shaping and codifying an organizational template on which business schools form identities and identification with the field. The rankings codify this template by defining belongingness to a group, specifying measures for competition and comparison, and by promoting role models. Through the template, isomorphic pressures are mediated by the use of both specific and ambiguous criteria for performance, and in the way the template guides and channels imitation processes. This way, the template secures similarity and recognition of 'belonging together' in the field while allowing for considerable variation in organizational practices and identities. European Management Review (2007) 4, 24-39. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500073
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 39
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
47Porac J., 1990, Academy of Management Review, V15, DOI DOI 10.2307/258155
[2]  
Albert Stuart., 1985, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V7, P263, DOI DOI 10.1177/1059601112473815
[3]   When market information constitutes fields: Sensemaking of markets in the commercial music industry [J].
Anand, N ;
Peterson, RA .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2000, 11 (03) :270-284
[4]  
Anand N, 2004, ACAD MANAGE J, V47, P59, DOI [10.2307/20159560, 10.5465/20159560]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, FINANCIAL TIMES
[6]  
[Anonymous], MODERNE ORG TRENDER
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FINANCIAL TIMES
[8]  
[Anonymous], LEARNING EMPLOYABLE
[9]   When accreditation standards change: Factors affecting differential responsiveness of public and private organizations [J].
Casile, M ;
Davis-Blake, A .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 45 (01) :180-195
[10]  
Czarniawska B., 1997, NARRATING ORG DRAMAS