AHP-based evaluation of AHP-software

被引：90

作者：

Ossadnik, W ^{[1
]}

Lange, O ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Osnabruck, Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissensch, D-49069 Osnabruck, Germany

来源：

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH | 1999年 / 118卷 / 03期

关键词：

analytic hierarchy process; software evaluation; decision support systems;

D O I：

10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00321-X

中图分类号：

C93 [管理学];

学科分类号：

12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;

摘要：

The software support can reduce barriers of application of MCDM procedures. In this article, we evaluate the quality of three software products supporting the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), We employ the results of the evaluation to generate paired comparisons which are integrated into an AHP-based decision model. The relevant criteria of this model are derived from the international norm ISO/IEC 9126. In conclusion we provide a way to present both, a better transparency of the operative capability of the AHP and a generally applicable method to evaluate AHP-Software. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：578 / 588

页数：11

共 7 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE

[2]

Buede D., 1992, J MULTICRITERIA DECI, V1, P119

[3] Expert choice professional: Decision support software [J].

Garson, GD .

SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 1997, 15 (02) :221-224

[4]

*ISO IEC, 1991, INF TECHN SOFTW PROD

[5]

Keeney R. L, 1993, DECISIONS MULTIPLE O, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139174084

[6]

Ossadnik W., 1998, MEHRZIELORIENTIERTES

[7] WHY BE CONSISTENT - A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF CONSISTENCY REQUIREMENTS IN CHOICE THEORY [J].

SUGDEN, R .

ECONOMICA, 1985, 52 (206) :167-183

← 1 →