Coupling of adsorption, coagulation, and ultrafiltration processes for the removal of emerging contaminants in a secondary effluent

被引:99
作者
Acero, Juan L. [1 ]
Javier Benitez, F. [1 ]
Real, Francisco J. [1 ]
Teva, Fernando [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Extremadura, Dept Ingn Quim & Quim Fis, Badajoz 06006, Spain
关键词
Emerging contaminants; Municipal secondary effluent; Ultrafiltration; Permeate flux; Adsorption; Coagulation; ACTIVATED CARBON; WATER-TREATMENT; MEMBRANE FILTRATION; WASTE-WATER; NANOFILTRATION; REUSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2012.08.043
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
083001 [环境科学];
摘要
The removal of eleven emerging contaminants (acetaminophen, metoprolol, caffeine, antipyrine, sulfamethoxazole, flumequine, ketorolac, atrazine, isoproturon, 2-hydroxybiphenyl and diclofenac) present in a WWTP effluent by applying several combined treatments has been investigated. These combinations were constituted by PAC adsorption and/or coagulation pre-treatments followed by UF, as well as by an UF treatment followed by GAC adsorption post-treatment. PAC pre-treatment decreased membrane fouling, with the advantage that PAC was separated from the final effluent in the UF step. Low PAC dose in the range 10-50 mg L-1 in the adsorption pre-treatment was enough in order to remove most of the emerging contaminants and to partially improve water quality parameters. However, if the goal is to reach a high improvement of water quality parameters in the pre-treatment step, a PAC dose above 500 mg L-1 was required. Although coagulation pre-treatment did not increase appreciably the permeate flux in the UF step, the final quality of the permeate was improved, especially when the combination Fe(III)/UF was applied. Finally, a significant positive effect of the GAC post-treatment after the UF treatment was appreciated, which led to an increase in the removal of the water quality parameters and a significant elimination of emerging contaminants. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
Treatment of primary effluent by coagulation-adsorption-ultrafiltration for reuse [J].
Abdessemed, D ;
Nezzal, G .
DESALINATION, 2003, 152 (1-3) :367-373
[2]
Retention of emerging micropollutants from UP water and a municipal secondary effluent by ultrafiltration and nanofiltration [J].
Acero, Juan L. ;
Javier Benitez, F. ;
Teva, Fernando ;
Leal, Ana I. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2010, 163 (03) :264-272
[3]
Assessing PAC contribution to the NOM fouling control in PAC/UF systems [J].
Campinas, Margarida ;
Rosa, Maria Joao .
WATER RESEARCH, 2010, 44 (05) :1636-1644
[4]
Clesceri L.S., 1989, STANDARD METHODS EXA, V17th
[5]
A coagulation-powdered activated carbon-ultrafiltration - Multiple barrier approach for removing toxins from two Australian cyanobacterial blooms [J].
Dixon, Mike B. ;
Richard, Yann ;
Ho, Lionel ;
Chow, Christopher W. K. ;
O'Neill, Brian K. ;
Newcombe, Gayle .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2011, 186 (2-3) :1553-1559
[6]
Low-pressure membrane filtration of secondary effluent in water reuse: Pre-treatment for fouling reduction [J].
Fan, Linhua ;
Nguyen, Thang ;
Roddick, Felicity A. ;
Harris, John L. .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2008, 320 (1-2) :135-142
[7]
Freundlich H., 1939, J. Am. Chem. Soc, V61, P2228, DOI DOI 10.1021/JA01877A071
[8]
Influence of standard wastewater parameters and pre-flocculation on the fouling capacity during dead end membrane filtration of wastewater treatment effluents [J].
Fuchs, W. ;
Theiss, M. ;
Braun, R. .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 52 (01) :46-52
[9]
Role of membrane pore size in tertiary flocculation/adsorption/ultrafiltration treatment of municipal wastewater [J].
Goren, Uri ;
Aharoni, Avi ;
Kummel, Mario ;
Messalem, Rami ;
Mukmenev, Igor ;
Brenner, Asher ;
Gitis, Vitaly .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 61 (02) :193-203
[10]
Experimental investigation of adsorption-flocculation-microfiltration hybrid system in wastewater reuse [J].
Guo, WS ;
Vigneswaran, S ;
Ngo, HH ;
Chapman, H .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2004, 242 (1-2) :27-35