The interaction between propofol and clonidine for loss of consciousness

被引:20
作者
Higuchi, H
Adachi, Y
Dahan, A
Olofsen, E
Arimura, S
Mori, T
Satoh, T
机构
[1] Self Def Force Hanshin Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Kawanishi, Hyogo 6660024, Japan
[2] Natl Def Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-200204000-00021
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Clonidine premedication reduces the intraoperative requirement for opioids and volatile anesthetics Clonidine also reduces the induction dose of IV anesthetics. There is no information, however, regarding the effect of oral clonidine premedication on the propofol blood concentrations required for loss of consciousness, and the interaction between propofol and clonidine. We randomly administered target effect-SAL concentrations of propofol ranging from 0.5 to 5.0 mug/mL by using computer-assisted target-controlled infusion to 3 groups of healthy male patients: Control (n = 35), 2.5 mug/kg Clonidine (n = 36), and 5.0 mug/kg Clonidine (n = 36) groups. Nothing was administered to the Control group. Clonidine (2.5 or 5.0 mug/kg) was administered orally 90 min before the induction of anesthesia in the Clonidine groups. After equilibration between the blood and effect-site for 15 min, a verbal command to open their eyes was given two times to the patients. Arterial blood samples for analysis of the serum propofol and clonidine concentrations were taken immediately before verbal commands were given. Measured serum propofol concentrations in equilibrium with the effect-site at which 50% of the patients did not respond to verbal commands (EC50 for loss of consciousness) were determined by logistic regression. The EC50 +/- SE values in the Control, 2.5 mug/kg Clonidine, and 5.0 mug/kg Clonidine groups were 2.67 +/- 0.18,1.31 +/- 0.12, and 0.91 +/- 0.13 mug/mL, respectively. The EC50 in the 2.5 and 5.0 mug/kg clonidine groups was significantly smaller than that in the Control group (P < 0.001). The use of a response surface modeling analysis indicated that there was an additive interaction between measured arterial propofol and clonidine concentrations in relation to loss of consciousness. These results indicate that propofol and clonidine act additively for loss of consciousness.
引用
收藏
页码:886 / 891
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   The determinants of propofol induction of anesthesia dose [J].
Adachi, YU ;
Watanabe, K ;
Higuchi, H ;
Satoh, T .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 92 (03) :656-661
[2]  
ARNDTS D, 1979, ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCH, V29-1, P532
[3]  
BEAL SL, 1998, NONMEN USERS GUIDE
[4]   Response surface modeling of alfentanil-sevoflurane interaction on cardiorespiratory control and bispectral index [J].
Dahan, A ;
Nieuwenhuijs, D ;
Olofsen, E ;
Sarton, E ;
Romberg, R ;
Teppema, L .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 94 (06) :982-991
[5]   Women emerge from general anesthesia with propofol/alfentanil/nitrous oxide faster than men [J].
Gan, TJ ;
Glass, PS ;
Sigl, J ;
Sebel, P ;
Payne, F ;
Rosow, C ;
Embree, P .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (05) :1283-1287
[6]   EFFECTS OF CLONIDINE ON NARCOTIC REQUIREMENTS AND HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSE DURING INDUCTION OF FENTANYL ANESTHESIA AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION [J].
GHIGNONE, M ;
QUINTIN, L ;
DUKE, PC ;
KEHLER, CH ;
CALVILLO, O .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1986, 64 (01) :36-42
[7]   ANESTHESIA AND HYPERTENSION - THE EFFECT OF CLONIDINE ON PERIOPERATIVE HEMODYNAMICS AND ISOFLURANE REQUIREMENTS [J].
GHIGNONE, M ;
CALVILLO, O ;
QUINTIN, L .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1987, 67 (01) :3-10
[8]   Oral clonidine premedication reduces induction dose and prolongs awakening time from propofol-nitrous oxide anesthesia [J].
Goyagi, T ;
Tanaka, M ;
Nishikawa, T .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1999, 46 (09) :894-896
[9]   ENHANCEMENT BY PROPOFOL OF THE GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID(A) RESPONSE IN DISSOCIATED HIPPOCAMPAL PYRAMIDAL NEURONS OF THE RAT [J].
HARA, M ;
KAI, Y ;
IKEMOTO, Y .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 81 (04) :988-994
[10]   Clinical uses of α2-adrenergic agonists [J].
Kamibayashi, T ;
Maze, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (05) :1345-1349