Long-term outcome following loose-seton technique for external sphincter preservation in complex anal fistula

被引:123
作者
Buchanan, GN
Owen, HA
Torkington, J
Lunniss, PJ
Nicholls, RJ
Cohen, CRG
机构
[1] St Marks Hosp, Dept Surg, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
[2] Royal London Hosp, Acad Dept Surg, London E1 1BB, England
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bjs.4466
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study determined the long-term outcome after use of the loose-seton technique (LST) to eradicate complex fistula in ano. Methods: Twenty patients whose complex fistula in ano was treated by the LST a minimum of 10 years previously were assessed by case-note review, supplemented where necessary by mailed and telephone interview. Results: Eighteen patients had a trans-sphincteric and two a suprasphincteric fistula. There were seven supralevator and 12 ischiorectal secondary extensions. At short-term follow-up, a median of 6 months following seton removal, perianal sepsis had been eradicated in 13 of 20 patients. However, the long-term success rate of the LST was lower than that noted in the short term (four versus 13 of 20). Sixteen patients had persisting or recurrent sepsis, necessitating further surgery in 13. In the long term, external sphincter division was necessary to control sepsis in seven of the 20 patients compared with three of 20 patients at short-term follow-up. The rate of relapse in those with Crohn's disease and cryptoglandular fistula in ano was similar (five of six versus 11 of 14; P = 1.000). The fistula recurred in seven, 11 and 15 patients at 6, 15 and 60 months respectively after seton removal. Conclusion: The success rate of the LST for complex fistula in ano falls over time. Counselling before seton removal should emphasize that, although most patients do not require sphincter division and some are cured by this technique, many patients develop further sepsis that usually requires surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:476 / 480
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
Potential clinical implications of direction of a trans-sphincteric anal fistula track [J].
Buchanan, GN ;
Williams, AB ;
Bartram, CI ;
Halligan, S ;
Nicholls, RJ ;
Cohen, CRG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (10) :1250-1255
[2]
Fecal incontinence severity index after fistulotomy - A predictor of quality of life [J].
Cavanaugh, M ;
Hyman, N ;
Osler, T .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2002, 45 (03) :349-353
[3]
García-Aguilar J, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P243
[4]
Patient satisfaction after surgical treatment for fistula-in-ano [J].
García-Aguilar, J ;
Davey, CS ;
Le, CT ;
Lowry, AC ;
Rothenberger, DA .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2000, 43 (09) :1206-1212
[5]
Cutting seton for anal fistulas - High risk of minor control defects [J].
Goldberg, SM ;
Shelton, AA .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1997, 40 (12) :1447-1447
[6]
HAWLEY PR, 1975, CLIN GASTROENTEROL, V4, P635
[7]
Prospective randomised trial comparing ayurvedic cutting seton and fistulotomy for low fistula-in-ano [J].
Ho K.S. ;
Tsang C. ;
Seow-Choen F. ;
Ho Y.H. ;
Tang C.L. ;
Heah S.M. ;
Eu K.W. .
Techniques in Coloproctology, 2001, 5 (3) :137-141
[8]
FISTULOTOMY WITHOUT EXTERNAL SPHINCTER DIVISION FOR HIGH ANAL FISTULAS [J].
KENNEDY, HL ;
ZEGARRA, JP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1990, 77 (08) :898-901
[9]
FACTORS AFFECTING CONTINENCE AFTER SURGERY FOR ANAL FISTULA [J].
LUNNISS, PJ ;
KAMM, MA ;
PHILLIPS, RKS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (09) :1382-1385
[10]
Lunniss PJ, 1996, ANAL FISTULA SURG EV, P92