Efficacy and safety of two new methods of rapid intravenous detoxification in heroin addicts previously treated without success

被引:59
作者
Seoane, A
Carrasco, G
Cabre, L
Puiggros, A
Hernandez, E
Alvarez, M
Costa, J
Molina, R
Sobrepere, G
机构
[1] HOSP BARCELONA,SCIAS,INTENS CARE SERV,QUAL SEDAT RES GRP,BARCELONA,SPAIN
[2] PARIS ASSOC,BARCELONA,SPAIN
关键词
D O I
10.1192/bjp.171.4.340
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background New methods of rapid opiate detoxification, under intravenous sedation, can detoxify heroin-addicted patients in 24 hours. Their clinical application has been limited by the lack of studies establishing both efficacy and safety. Method In a randomised, controlled study, 300 treatment-refractory, heroin-addicted patients received rapid intravenous detoxification treatment (naloxone infusion, 0.06-0.08 mg/kg, then oral naltrexone 50 mg/day) under either monitored light intravenous sedation or unmonitored deep intravenous sedation. Results All patients were successfully detoxified and 93% remained abstinent one month later. Severity of withdrawal, according to the Wang Scale modified by Loimer, was 4.9 (s.d. 3.0) points in the light sedation group and 4.8 (s.d. 2.9) in the deep sedation group (P = 0.26). Two patients (1.3%) in the light sedation group and four (2.6%) in the deep sedation group required tracheal intubation (P = 0.31). There was only one severe complication, a case of nosocomial aspirative pneumonia which improved with antibiotic treatment. Conclusions Successful rapid intravenous detoxification can be achieved using relatively light levels of sedation.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 345
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Altman DG, 1991, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, P396
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, V4th
[3]   On the specific effectiveness, and under-valuing, of pharmacological treatments for addiction: A comparison of methadone, naltrexone and disulfiram with psychosocial interventions [J].
Brewer, C .
ADDICTION RESEARCH, 1996, 3 (04) :297-313
[4]  
BREWER C, 1995, ADDICT RES, V3, P1
[5]   PROPOFOL VS MIDAZOLAM IN SHORT-TERM, MEDIUM-TERM, AND LONG-TERM SEDATION OF CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS - A COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS [J].
CARRASCO, G ;
MOLINA, R ;
COSTA, J ;
SOLER, JM ;
CABRE, L .
CHEST, 1993, 103 (02) :557-564
[6]  
CHARNEY DS, 1986, AM J PSYCHIAT, V143, P831
[7]  
Fishbain D A, 1993, Ann Clin Psychiatry, V5, P53, DOI 10.3109/10401239309148924
[8]   CONSCIOUS SEDATION, CLINICALLY RELEVANT COMPLICATIONS AND MONITORING OF ENDOSCOPY - RESULTS OF A NATIONWIDE SURVEY IN SWITZERLAND [J].
FROEHLICH, F ;
GONVERS, JJ ;
FRIED, M .
ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 26 (02) :231-234
[9]   OPIATE WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS IN RESPONSE TO 10-DAY AND 21-DAY METHADONE WITHDRAWAL PROGRAMS [J].
GOSSOP, M ;
GRIFFITHS, P ;
BRADLEY, B ;
STRANG, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1989, 154 :360-363
[10]   STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE COMPLIANCE WITH NARCOTIC-ANTAGONISTS [J].
KOSTEN, TR ;
KLEBER, HD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE, 1984, 10 (02) :249-266