Assessment of budesonide patch tests

被引:15
作者
Bjarnason, B [1 ]
Flosadóttir, E
Fischer, T
机构
[1] Karolinska Hosp, Dept Dermatol, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Fac Odontol, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Natl Inst Working Life, Solna, Sweden
关键词
laser Doppler imaging; skin perfusion; allergic contact dermatitis; patch testing technique; bioengineering methods; immunosuppression; corticosteroids; budesonide;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06132.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Patch-test technique for budesonide needs improvement. 20 subjects with positive or questionable patch-test responses to budesonide were retested for 3 to 96 h (4 days [D]) with polyester patches coated with budesonide in serial doses (150 to 0.074 mu g/cm(2)). Multiple readings were taken visually and with a laser Doppler perfusion imaging technique up to 264 h (day [D]11). Additionally, all subjects were tested with 0.1% budesonide in petrolatum in Finn Chambers(R) for 48 h (2D) with readings taken at 72 (D3), 96 (D4) and 168 h (D7). Different dose levels and application times affected unpredictably highest assessments of reactions. No clear suppression of reactivity was observed at high doses. Time points of highest assessments of reactions varied between subjects but were generally the same for each subject with both reading methods regardless of dose levels or application times. Positive and negative subjects during the study were easily distinguished with all serial doses, regardless of assessment technique. At 2.0 mu g/cm(2), the lowest dose level tested on all subjects, longer applications than 24 h (1D) were required to detect all positive subjects. 48-h (2-D) applications required 2 readings, optimally at 96 (D4) and 216 h (D9). The only test technique with Finn Chambers" used here did not make such distinction possible.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 217
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   BIOENGINEERING AND THE PATCH TEST [J].
BERARDESCA, E ;
MAIBACH, HI .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1988, 18 (01) :3-9
[2]   CONTACT HYPERSENSITIVITY TO CORTICOSTEROIDS IN ROUTINE PATCH TEST PATIENTS - A MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE SWISS CONTACT-DERMATITIS RESEARCH GROUP [J].
BIRCHER, AJ ;
THURLIMANN, W ;
HUNZIKER, T ;
PASCHEKOO, F ;
HUNZIKER, N ;
PERRENOUD, D ;
ELSNER, P ;
SCHULTHEISS, R .
DERMATOLOGY, 1995, 191 (02) :109-114
[3]   Objective assessment of nickel sulfate patch test reactions with laser Doppler perfusion imaging [J].
Bjarnason, B ;
Fischer, T .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1998, 39 (03) :112-118
[4]   Objective non-invasive assessment of patch tests with the laser Doppler perfusion scanning technique [J].
Bjarnason, B ;
Flosadóttir, E ;
Fischer, T .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1999, 40 (05) :251-260
[5]  
Bjarnason B, 1998, Am J Contact Dermat, V9, P224, DOI 10.1016/S1046-199X(98)90033-1
[6]   SCREENING FOR CORTICOSTEROID CONTACT HYPERSENSITIVITY [J].
BOFFA, MJ ;
WILKINSON, SM ;
BECK, MH .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1995, 33 (03) :149-151
[7]   0.1-PERCENT TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE OINTMENT AND PATCH TEST RESPONSES [J].
CLARK, RA ;
RIETSCHEL, RL .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1982, 118 (03) :163-165
[8]   CONTACT ALLERGY TO HYDROCORTISONE AND THIXOCORTOL PIVALATE - PROBLEMS IN THE DETECTION OF CORTICOSTEROID SENSITIVITY [J].
DOOMSGOOSSENS, A ;
VERSCHAEVE, H ;
DEGREEF, H ;
VANBERENDONCKS, J .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1986, 14 (02) :94-102
[9]   RESULTS OF ROUTINE PATCH TESTING WITH CORTICOSTEROID SERIES IN 2073 PATIENTS [J].
DOOMSGOOSSENS, A ;
MORREN, M .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1992, 26 (03) :182-191
[10]   CONTACT ALLERGY TO CORTICOSTEROIDS - A FREQUENTLY MISSED DIAGNOSIS [J].
DOOMSGOOSSENS, AE ;
DEGREEF, HJ ;
MARIEN, KJC ;
COOPMAN, SA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1989, 21 (03) :538-543