Two-dimensional physically based finite element runoff model for small agricultural watersheds: II. Model testing and field application

被引:2
作者
Bhardwaj, Anil [1 ]
Kaushal, M. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Punjab Agr Univ, Coll Agr Engn, Dept Soil & Water Engn, Ludhiana 141004, Punjab, India
关键词
runoff model; event-oriented; model testing; sensitivity analysis; validation; agricultural watershed; RAINFALL; LOSSES; FLOW;
D O I
10.1002/hyp.7170
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Mathematical models are useful analysis tools to understand problems in watersheds associated with runoff, and to find Solutions through land use changes and best management practices. However, before a model is applied in the field, it must be tested and checked to ensure that the model represents the real world adequately. In this paper, a two-dimensional physically based finite element runoff model ROMO2D has been verified and validated by comparing the model output with analytic solution under simplified conditions, published data, and field measurements. Calibration of the model was done manually through a multi-objective calibration procedure. using observed field data. Before going for field validation/application of ROMO2D, analysis was carried Out to determine the Optimum number of finite elements into which the watershed should be discretized and the size of the time step. A sensitivity analysis of the model was performed using the observed values of watershed parameters. The model was applied to a 1.45 ha agricultural watershed located in the Shiwalik foothills (India) to simulate runoff. The results demonstrated the potential of the model to simulate runoff from small agricultural watersheds for individual storm events with reasonable accuracy. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 418
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, J IRRIG DRAIN ENG, V119, P429
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1966, 39 STANF U
[3]   Two-dimensional physically based finite element runoff model for small agricultural watersheds: I. Model development [J].
Bhardwaj, Anil ;
Kaushal, M. P. .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2009, 23 (03) :397-407
[4]  
Chung SW, 2002, T ASAE, V45, P1135
[5]   Validation of EPIC for two watersheds in southwest Iowa [J].
Chung, SW ;
Gassman, PW ;
Kramer, LA ;
Williams, JR ;
Gu, R .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1999, 28 (03) :971-979
[6]  
Coffey AE, 2004, T ASAE, V47, P59, DOI 10.13031/2013.15870
[7]  
Day PR., 1965, Am. Soc. Agron, V1, P545, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR9.1.C43
[8]  
DONIGIAN JR. A. S., 2002, P WEF NAT TMDL SCI P
[9]  
Eagleson P. S., 1970, DYNAMIC HYDROLOGY, P325
[10]   Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information [J].
Gupta, HV ;
Sorooshian, S ;
Yapo, PO .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1998, 34 (04) :751-763