Floating treatment wetland retrofit to improve stormwater pond performance for suspended solids, copper and zinc

被引:115
作者
Borne, Karine E. [1 ]
Fassman, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Tanner, Chris C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Civil & Environm Dept, Auckland Mail Ctr, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
[2] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, Hamilton, New Zealand
关键词
Floating treatment wetland; Stormwater; Zinc; Copper; Total suspended solids; Treatment; Performance; Nonpoint source pollution; Constructed wetland; Retention pond; PARTICULATE MATTER SUBJECT; CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS; HIGHWAY RUNOFF; RAINFALL-RUNOFF; POLLUTANTS; REMOVAL; WATERS; TEMPERATURE; MOBILITY; METALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.01.031
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
A field trial study with side-by-side monitoring of two parallel stormwater treatment ponds, one of which contained a floating treatment wetland (FTW), has been carried out to assess the benefit of retrofitting a conventional retention pond with a FTW. Inflow and outflow event mean concentrations (EMCs) were quantified and used to assess the overall pollutant removal efficiency of each system. Findings show that a FTW can significantly improve the runoff water quality and thus reduce the impact on the receiving environment. The present study reveals that a pond retrofit with a FTW would be more efficient than a conventional retention pond, exhibiting a 41% (for total suspended solids - TSS), 40% (for particulate zinc - PZn), 39% (for particulate copper - PCu) and 16% (for dissolved copper - DCu) lower effluent EMC. Physical entrapment of the particulate pollutants into the roots' biofilm seems be a significant removal pathway, which could be impacted by the inflow volume. Due to higher humic content, lower dissolved oxygen and more neutral water column pH induced by the FTW, there was increased potential for adsorption processes and/or precipitation as insoluble copper sulphides, in addition to the direct Cu uptake by the plants. The dissolved zinc (DZn) inlet EMCs, which already met the Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council (ANZECC) water quality guidelines and could correspond to an irreducible concentration of the system, were too low to differentiate the performance of either pond. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 182
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Environmental Hydraulics for Open Channel Flows
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Standard methods for the examination of water and waste- water
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1989, DISCHARGE MEASUREMEN
[5]  
Auckland Regional Council, 2003, TP10 DES GUID MAN ST
[6]  
Auckland Regional Council, 1999, TP108 GUID STORMW RU
[7]   Comparison of BMP performance using the International BMP Database [J].
Barrett, Michael E. .
JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2008, 134 (05) :556-561
[8]   Stormwater treatment: do constructed wetlands yield improved pollutant management performance over a detention pond system? [J].
Bavor, HJ ;
Davies, CM ;
Sakadevan, K .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 44 (11-12) :565-570
[9]   Size Fractionation of Heavy Metals in Highway Runoff Waters [J].
Bechet, Beatrice ;
Durin, Bertrand ;
Legret, Michel ;
Le Cloirec, Pierre .
HIGHWAY AND URBAN ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 17 :235-+
[10]  
Borne K. E., WATER SCI TECH UNPUB