Effect of Financial Incentives to Physicians, Patients, or Both on Lipid Levels A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:142
作者
Asch, David A. [1 ,2 ]
Troxel, Andrea B. [1 ]
Stewart, Walter F. [3 ]
Sequist, Thomas D. [4 ,5 ]
Jones, James B. [3 ]
Hirsch, AnneMarie G. [6 ]
Hoffer, Karen [1 ]
Zhu, Jingsan [1 ]
Wang, Wenli [1 ]
Hodlofski, Amanda [1 ]
Frasch, Antonette B. [1 ]
Weiner, Mark G. [7 ]
Finnerty, Darra D. [1 ]
Rosenthal, Meredith B. [8 ]
Gangemi, Kelsey [1 ]
Volpp, Kevin G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Dept Vet Affairs, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Sutter Hlth Syst, Sacramento, CA USA
[4] Partners Healthcare Syst, Boston, MA USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[6] Geisinger Hlth Syst, Danville, PA USA
[7] Temple Univ, Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[8] Harvard Univ, TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2015年 / 314卷 / 18期
关键词
PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; HOSPITAL PAY; ADHERENCE; MORTALITY; IMPROVE; CARE; DISCONTINUATION; CHOLESTEROL; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2015.14850
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Financial incentives to physicians or patients are increasingly used, but their effectiveness is not well established. OBJECTIVE To determine whether physician financial incentives, patient incentives, or shared physician and patient incentives are more effective than control in reducing levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) among patients with high cardiovascular risk. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Four-group, multicenter, cluster randomized clinical trial with a 12-month intervention conducted from 2011 to 2014 in 3 primary care practices in the northeastern United States. Three hundred forty eligible primary care physicians (PCPs) were enrolled from a pool of 421. Of 25 627 potentially eligible patients of those PCPs, 1503 enrolled. Patients aged 18 to 80 years were eligible if they had a 10-year Framingham Risk Score (FRS) of 20% or greater, had coronary artery disease equivalents with LDL-C levels of 120mg/dL or greater, or had an FRS of 10% to 20% with LDL-C levels of 140 mg/dL or greater. Investigators were blinded to study group, but participants were not. INTERVENTIONS Primary care physicians were randomly assigned to control, physician incentives, patient incentives, or shared physician-patient incentives. Physicians in the physician incentives group were eligible to receive up to $1024 per enrolled patientmeeting LDL-C goals. Patients in the patient incentives group were eligible for the same amount, distributed through daily lotteries tied to medication adherence. Physicians and patients in the shared incentives group shared these incentives. Physicians and patients in the control group received no incentives tied to outcomes, but all patient participants received up to $355 each for trial participation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Change in LDL-C level at 12 months. RESULTS Only patients in the shared physician-patient incentives group achieved reductions in LDL-C levels statistically different from those in the control group (8.5mg/dL; 95% CI, 3.8-13.3; P=.002). For comparison of all 4 groups, P < .001. [GRAPHICS] CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In primary care practices, shared financial incentives for physicians and patients, but not incentives to physicians or patients alone, resulted in a statistically significant difference in reduction of LDL-C levels at 12 months. This reduction was modest, however, and further information is needed to understand whether this approach represents good value.
引用
收藏
页码:1926 / 1935
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Factors associated with discharge lipid-lowering drug prescription in patients hospitalized for coronary artery disease (from the get with the guidelines database) [J].
Albert, Nancy M. ;
Birtcher, Kimberly K. ;
Cannon, Christopher P. ;
Goff, David C., Jr. ;
Mulgund, Jyotsna ;
Liang, Li ;
Fonarow, Gregg C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 101 (09) :1242-1246
[2]  
[Anonymous], STATINS ACTIONS SIDE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, MULTIPLE IMPUTATION
[4]  
Asch David A, 2012, LDI Issue Brief, V17, P1
[5]   Missed opportunities in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction: An assessment of the effects of statin underprescribing on mortality [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Mamdani, Muhammad M. ;
Juurlink, David N. ;
Alter, David A. ;
Tu, Jack V. .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 151 (05) :969-974
[6]   Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins [J].
Baigent, C ;
Keech, A ;
Kearney, PM ;
Blackwell, L ;
Buck, G ;
Pollicino, C ;
Kirby, A ;
Sourjina, T ;
Peto, R ;
Collins, R ;
Simes, J .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9493) :1267-1278
[7]  
Blackburn DF, 2005, CAN J CARDIOL, V21, P485
[8]   The implementation of a translational study involving a primary care based behavioral program to improve blood pressure control: The HTN-IMPROVE study protocol (01295) [J].
Bosworth, Hayden B. ;
Almirall, Daniel ;
Weiner, Bryan J. ;
Maciejewski, Mathew ;
Kaufman, Miriam A. ;
Powers, Benjamin J. ;
Oddone, Eugene Z. ;
Lee, Shoou-Yih D. ;
Damush, Teresa M. ;
Smith, Valerie ;
Olsen, Maren K. ;
Anderson, Daren ;
Roumie, Christianne L. ;
Rakley, Susan ;
Del Monte, Pamela S. ;
Bowen, Michael E. ;
Kravetz, Jeffrey D. ;
Jackson, George L. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2010, 5
[9]   Emotions and preventive health behavior: Worry, regret, and influenza vaccination [J].
Chapman, GB ;
Coups, EJ .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 25 (01) :82-90
[10]   Regret in economic and psychological theories of choice [J].
Connolly, T ;
Butler, D .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2006, 19 (02) :139-154