Recent approaches to psychological interventions for people at risk of psychosis

被引:46
作者
Bechdolf, A [1 ]
Phillips, LJ
Francey, SM
Leicester, S
Morrison, AP
Veith, V
Klosterkötter, J
McGorry, PD
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, FETZ, Early Recognit & Intervent Ctr Mental Crises, D-50924 Cologne, Germany
[2] ORYGEN Youth Hlth, Personal Assessment & Crisis Evaluat Clin, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Manchester, EDIE, Dept Psychol, Manchester, Lancs, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
schizophrenia; prodrome; early intervention; psychological treatment; cognitive behavioural therapy;
D O I
10.1007/s00406-006-0623-0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
With the emerging global focus on early psychosis, indicated prevention in schizophrenia has increasingly become a focus of psychiatric research interests. It has been argued that CBT may have some advantages compared with antipsychotics regarding this issue. According to MEDLINE, EMBASE and Psycinfo two completed randomised controlled trials (RCTs; PACE, Melbourne, Australia; EDIE, Manchester, United Kingdom) and one ongoing RCT with only preliminary results published so far (FETZ, Cologne/Bonn, Germany) on indicated prevention in schizophrenia including manualised and standardised psychological treatment can be identified. The aims of the present paper are to present and discuss the three approaches with regard to (I) inclusion, exclusion and exit criteria, (II) characteristics of interventions and (III) evaluations. All interventions use intake, exclusion and exit criteria, which have been evaluated in prospective follow-along studies. The approaches are based on the general structure and principles of cognitive behavioural therapy which have been developed, applied and evaluated in a wide range of mental health problems. Despite several methodological limitations, the first evaluations indicate some effects with regard to three possible aims of early intervention: (1) improvement of present possible pre-psychotic symptoms, (2) prevention of social decline/stagnation and (3) prevention or delay of progression to psychosis. Even though the first results are promising, we conclude that several ethical issues have to be taken into consideration and further predictive and therapeutic research is needed to judge whether psychological intervention is a realistic option for the treatment of people at risk of psychosis.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 173
页数:15
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Amer Psychiat Assoc, 1998, AM J PSYCHIAT, V155, P1
[2]   Public attitude towards psychiatric treatment [J].
Angermeyer, MC ;
Matschinger, H .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1996, 94 (05) :326-336
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Am J Psychiatry, V157, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, ATTENTION EMOTION
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Treating Schizophrenia in the Prodromal Phase
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Journal of Mental Health
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2001, The world health report-mental health: New understanding, new hope
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Psychosis: Theory and Practice
[10]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOL INTERVENTION