On the implementation of dose-volume objectives in gradient algorithms for inverse treatment planning

被引:15
作者
Hristov, D
Stavrev, P
Sham, E
Fallone, BG
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Montreal Gen Hosp, Ctr Hlth, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
[2] Cross Canc Inst, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
关键词
inverse treatment planing; gradient; dose-volume constraints; penalty function; steepest descent;
D O I
10.1118/1.1469629
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A method that allows a straightforward implementation of dose-volume constraints in gradient algorithms for inverse treatment planning is presented. The method is consistent with the penalty function approach, which requires the formulation of an objective function with penalty terms proportional to the magnitudes of constraint violations. Dose constraints with respect to minimum and maximum target dose levels are incorporated in quadratic, dose-penalty terms. Analogously, quadratic volume-penalty terms in the objective function reflect the violation of dose-volume constraints imposing limits on the fractions of healthy organ volumes that can be irradiated above specified dose levels. It has been demonstrated that within the framework of this formulation neither modified objective functions nor finite difference gradient calculations are necessary for the incorporation of gradient minimization algorithms. As an example, a simple steepest descent algorithm is presented along with its application to illustrate prostate and lung cases. (C) 2002 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:848 / 856
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Optimized planning using physical objectives and constraints [J].
Bortfeld, T .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) :20-+
[2]  
BORTFELD T, 1997, UNPUB 12 INT C US CO
[3]   Optimized radiation therapy based on radiobiological objectives [J].
Brahme, A .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) :35-47
[4]   Development of radiation therapy optimization [J].
Brahme, A .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2000, 39 (05) :579-595
[5]   Individualizing cancer treatment: Biological optimization models in treatment planning and delivery [J].
Brahme, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (02) :327-337
[6]   FITTING OF NORMAL TISSUE TOLERANCE DATA TO AN ANALYTIC-FUNCTION [J].
BURMAN, C ;
KUTCHER, GJ ;
EMAMI, B ;
GOITEIN, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01) :123-135
[7]   Multiple local minima in radiotherapy optimization problems with dose-volume constraints [J].
Deasy, JO .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (07) :1157-1161
[8]   TOLERANCE OF NORMAL TISSUE TO THERAPEUTIC IRRADIATION [J].
EMAMI, B ;
LYMAN, J ;
BROWN, A ;
COIA, L ;
GOITEIN, M ;
MUNZENRIDER, JE ;
SHANK, B ;
SOLIN, LJ ;
WESSON, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01) :109-122
[9]   An active set algorithm for treatment planning optimization [J].
Hristov, DH ;
Fallone, BG .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (09) :1455-1464
[10]  
International Commission in Radiation Units and Measurements, 1993, 50 ICRU