Effect of photopolymerization variables on composite hardness

被引:36
作者
Abate, PF [1 ]
Zahra, VN [1 ]
Macchi, RL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mpr.2001.120843
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
Statement of problem. Variations in light-polymerizing parameters, such as light intensity and light-to-material distance, may affect the physical characteristics of polymerized resin. Purpose. The purpose of thus study was to characterize the relation between total light energy and the final hardness of 4 composites polymerized under varying conditions. Material and methods. Four commercial composite restorative resins (Z100, Filtek A110, Tetric Ceram, and Tetric Flow) were used to prepare 4 disk-shaped specimens (6 x 2 mm) for each experimental condition. Photoactivation was carried out with a light device and energy of 22.6, 15.7, 9.0, or 6.7 J/cm(2). Either the light-to-material distance (0, 5, 10, 15 mm) or activation time (40, 28, 16, 12 seconds) was varied. Immediately after polymerization, Barcol hardness was determined on the specimen surface that had been exposed to the light. Analysis of variance (P < .05) and regression analysis were used to examine the data. Results. No significance (P > .05) was found for the overall effect of the experimental variables (polymerization time and distance), but significant differences (P < .01) were found among materials and energy levels. Regression equations for each product and polymerization condition were calculated for hardness as a function of energy. No significant differences were found for slopes within each material. Hardness values were 3.0 to 3.5 for Tetric Ceram, Tetric Flow, and Filtek A110 and approximately 4.9 for Z100. Conclusion. The hardness of the products analyzed was related to the total energy used for activation. The effect was independent of the manner in which die amount of energy was modified (light-to-material distance or activation time).
引用
收藏
页码:632 / 635
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Abate P F, 1997, Quintessence Int, V28, P345
[2]
Blankenau R J, 1991, Am J Dent, V4, P40
[3]
THE COMPETITION BETWEEN THE COMPOSITE-DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND THE POLYMERIZATION CONTRACTION STRESS [J].
DAVIDSON, CL ;
DEGEE, AJ ;
FEILZER, A .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1984, 63 (12) :1396-1399
[4]
SETTING STRESS IN COMPOSITE RESIN IN RELATION TO CONFIGURATION OF THE RESTORATION [J].
FEILZER, AJ ;
DEGEE, AJ ;
DAVIDSON, CL .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1987, 66 (11) :1636-1639
[5]
Koran P, 1998, AM J DENT, V11, P17
[6]
EFFECT OF EXCITATION-ENERGY ON DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND COMPOSITE PROPERTIES [J].
LEE, SY ;
GREENER, EH .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1994, 22 (03) :175-181
[7]
Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without 'softstart-polymerization' [J].
Mehl, A ;
Hickel, R ;
Kunzelmann, KH .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1997, 25 (3-4) :321-330
[8]
Effect of light exposure on fracture toughness and flexural strength of light-cured composites [J].
Miyazaki, M ;
Oshida, Y ;
Moore, BK ;
Onose, H .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1996, 12 (5-6) :328-332
[9]
Myers M L, 1994, J Prosthodont, V3, P149
[10]
Nomoto R, 1994, Dent Mater J, V13, P198