Breast cancer measurements with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and mammography

被引:131
作者
Davis, PL
Staiger, MJ
Harris, KB
Ganott, MA
Klementaviciene, J
McCarthy, KS
Tobon, H
机构
[1] UNIV PITTSBURGH,MED CTR,DEPT RADIOL,PITTSBURGH,PA 15213
[2] UNIV PITTSBURGH,MED CTR,DEPT PATHOL,PITTSBURGH,PA 15213
[3] UNIV PITTSBURGH,MED CTR,PITTSBURGH CANC INST,PITTSBURGH,PA 15213
[4] MAGEE WOMENS HOSP,MAGEE WOMENS BREAST CTR,PITTSBURGH,PA 15213
[5] MAGEE WOMENS HOSP,CTR BREAST CONSULTAT,PITTSBURGH,PA 15213
[6] MAGEE WOMENS HOSP,DEPT PATHOL,PITTSBURGH,PA 15213
关键词
breast neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging; cancer staging; cancer measurement; gadolinium contrast agent;
D O I
10.1007/BF01806626
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Accurate measurement of the size of breast cancers becomes more important as breast cancer therapy advances. This study reports the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasonography and mammography for measuring the largest breast cancer diameter in comparison to the pathology measurement. Materials and methods: Fourteen breast cancers were examined in 13 women with MRI, ultrasonography and mammography. The age range was 31-73 (mean 56). Six of the cancers were in premenopausal women. The MRI was performed with the intravenous injection of gadolinium based contrast agent and a three dimensional fast spoiled gradient echo sequence with fat suppression. The largest cancer diameter was measured with each imaging technique and compared to the largest cancer diameter measured at pathology. Results: At pathological examination cancers ranged from 0.6 to 6 cm (mean 2.2) in largest diameter. MRI measurements had the highest correlation coefficient (r = 0.98) and the smallest standard error (0.34). Ultrasonography measurements had a correlation coeffient of r = 0.45 and a standard error of 0.78. Mammography measurements had a correlation coefficient of r = 0.46 and a standard error of 1.04. Conclusions: MRI was more accurate than ultrasonography and mammography in measuring the largest cancer diameters in this group of women. This was particularly evident for several larger cancers, and a post-chemotherapy cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   PRIMARY CHEMOTHERAPY TO AVOID MASTECTOMY IN TUMORS WITH DIAMETERS OF 3 CENTIMETERS OR MORE [J].
BONADONNA, G ;
VERONESI, U ;
BRAMBILLA, C ;
FERRARI, L ;
LUINI, A ;
GRECO, M ;
BARTOLI, C ;
DEYOLDI, GC ;
ZUCALI, R ;
RILKE, F ;
ANDREOLA, S ;
SILVESTRINI, R ;
DIFRONZO, G ;
VALAGUSSA, P .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1990, 82 (19) :1539-1545
[2]   TUMOR RECURRENCE VERSUS FIBROSIS IN THE IRRADIATED BREAST - DIFFERENTIATION WITH DYNAMIC GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING [J].
DAO, TH ;
RAHMOUNI, A ;
CAMPANA, F ;
LAURENT, M ;
ASSELAIN, B ;
FOURQUET, A .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 187 (03) :751-755
[3]  
DEVITA VT, 1989, CANCER PRINCIPLES PR, P288
[4]  
FELDMAN LD, 1986, CANCER RES, V46, P2578
[5]  
FORNAGE BD, 1987, CANCER, V60, P765, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19870815)60:4<765::AID-CNCR2820600410>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-5
[7]   ASSESSMENT OF BREAST-CANCER RECURRENCE WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED SUBTRACTION MR-IMAGING - PRELIMINARY-RESULTS IN 26 PATIENTS [J].
GILLES, R ;
GUINEBRETIERE, JM ;
SHAPEERO, LG ;
LESNIK, A ;
CONTESSO, G ;
SARRAZIN, D ;
MASSELOT, J ;
VANEL, D .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 188 (02) :473-478
[8]   CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF THE BREAST [J].
GRIBBESTAD, IS ;
NILSEN, G ;
FJOSNE, H ;
FOUGNER, R ;
HAUGEN, OA ;
PETERSEN, SB ;
RINCK, PA ;
KVINNSLAND, S .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1992, 31 (08) :833-842
[9]   MR-IMAGING OF THE BREAST WITH ROTATING DELIVERY OF EXCITATION OFF RESONANCE - CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE WITH PATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION [J].
HARMS, SE ;
FLAMIG, DP ;
HESLEY, KL ;
MEICHES, MD ;
JENSEN, RA ;
EVANS, WP ;
SAVINO, DA ;
WELLS, RV .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 187 (02) :493-501
[10]   MR IMAGING OF THE BREAST WITH GD-DTPA - USE AND LIMITATIONS [J].
HEYWANG, SH ;
WOLF, A ;
PRUSS, E ;
HILBERTZ, T ;
EIERMANN, W ;
PERMANETTER, W .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 171 (01) :95-103