N of 1 randomised controlled trials of oral ketamine in patients with chronic pain

被引:65
作者
Haines, DR
Gaines, SP
机构
[1] Hull Royal Infirm, Dept Anaesthesia, Royal Hull Hosp NHS Trust, Hull HU3 2JZ, N Humberside, England
[2] Hull Royal Infirm, Dept Pharm, Royal Hull Hosp NHS Trust, Hull HU3 2JZ, N Humberside, England
关键词
chronic neuropathic pain; oral ketamine; n of 1 trials;
D O I
10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00117-7
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Anecdotal reports suggest that the general anaesthetic drug ketamine, taken orally in low doses, can give rise to some extra analgesia in patients with refractory neuropathic pain. This study was designed to determine the proportion of patients with chronic neuropathic pain responding to oral ketamine, and then to separate the true treatment effect from non-specific effects by means of an n of 1 randomised controlled trial. Twenty-one patients gave informed consent and completed dairy pain diaries and continued on their usual treatments (drug and non-drug) for the duration of the study. After a 'baseline' week, oral ketamine was taken once a day for 1 week. The dose of 20 mg was increased each day until an analgesic effect was noticed or adverse effects occurred, or until a maximum of 100 mg was reached. Those patients responding to oral ketamine were then entered into the n of 1 randomised trial which consisted of three treatment/placebo week pairs. Twelve patients did not progress to the n of 1 trial because of no benefit and/or intolerable adverse effects (dizziness, drowsiness etc.). Nine patients completed the n of 1 trial; there was no difference between the ketamine and placebo weeks in six patients; one patient demonstrated effective analgesia with ketamine, but it was of short duration and marred by unpleasant adverse effects; two patients showed some evidence of a beneficial response to ketamine, and continued with the oral ketamine after the trial. We conclude that oral ketamine only gave rise to an extra analgesic response in three out of 21 patients with chronic neuropathic pain (14%). Adverse effects limited the use of the drug in almost half of the patients. The n of I trial was useful in demonstrating no true therapeutic effect for the ketamine in two thirds of the patients progressing to that part of the trial. (C) 1999 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 287
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   RESPONSE OF CHRONIC NEUROPATHIC PAIN SYNDROMES TO KETAMINE - A PRELIMINARY-STUDY [J].
BACKONJA, M ;
ARNDT, G ;
GOMBAR, KA ;
CHECK, B ;
ZIMMERMANN, M .
PAIN, 1994, 56 (01) :51-57
[2]  
BORCHGREVINK PC, 1993, 7 WORLD C PAIN, P186
[3]   Ketamine injection used orally [J].
Broadley, KE ;
Kurowska, A ;
Tookman, A .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 1996, 10 (03) :247-250
[4]   CONTINUOUS SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF THE N-METHYL-D-ASPARTIC ACID (NMDA) RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST KETAMINE IN THE TREATMENT OF POSTHERPETIC NEURALGIA [J].
EIDE, PK ;
STUBHAUG, A ;
OYE, I ;
BREIVIK, H .
PAIN, 1995, 61 (02) :221-228
[5]   RELIEF OF POSTHERPETIC NEURALGIA WITH THE N-METHYL-D-ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST KETAMINE - A DOUBLE-BLIND, CROSS-OVER COMPARISON WITH MORPHINE AND PLACEBO [J].
EIDE, PK ;
JORUM, E ;
STUBHAUG, A ;
BREMNES, J ;
BREIVIK, H .
PAIN, 1994, 58 (03) :347-354
[6]   PHARMACOKINETICS AND ANALGESIC EFFECTS OF IM AND ORAL KETAMINE [J].
GRANT, IS ;
NIMMO, WS ;
CLEMENTS, JA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1981, 53 (08) :805-810
[7]  
GUYATT G, 1988, CAN MED ASSOC J, V139, P497
[8]   THE N-OF-1 RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL - CLINICAL USEFULNESS OUR 3-YEAR EXPERIENCE [J].
GUYATT, GH ;
KELLER, JL ;
JAESCHKE, R ;
ROSENBLOOM, D ;
ADACHI, JD ;
NEWHOUSE, MT .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 112 (04) :293-299
[9]   SUCCESSFUL TREATMENT OF POSTHERPETIC NEURALGIA WITH ORAL KETAMINE [J].
HOFFMANN, V ;
COPPEJANS, H ;
VERCAUTEREN, M ;
ADRIAENSEN, H .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1994, 10 (03) :240-242
[10]   INTERACTION OF THE CHIRAL FORMS OF KETAMINE WITH OPIOID, PHENCYCLIDINE, SIGMA AND MUSCARINIC RECEPTORS [J].
HUSTVEIT, O ;
MAURSET, A ;
OYE, I .
PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 1995, 77 (06) :355-359