Laboratory study of air sparging of TCE-Contaminated saturated soils and ground water

被引:16
作者
Adams, JA [1 ]
Reddy, KR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Mat Engn, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-6592.1999.tb00232.x
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Air sparging has proven to be an effective remediation technique for treating saturated soils and ground water contaminated by volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Since little is known about the system variables and mass transfer mechanisms important to air sparging, several researchers have recently performed laboratory investigations to study such issues. This paper presents the results of column experiments performed to investigate the behavior of dense nonaqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs), specifically trichloroethylene (TCE), during air sparging. The specific objectives of the study were (1) to compare the removal of dissolved TCE with the removal of dissolved light nonaqueous phase liquids (LNAPLs), such as benzene or toluene; (2) to determine the effect of injected air-flow rate on dissolved TCE removal; (3) to determine the effect of initial dissolved TCE concentration on removal efficiency: and (4) to determine the differences in removal between dissolved and pure-phase TCE. The test results showed that (1) the removal of dissolved TCE was similar to that of dissolved LNAPL; (2) increased air-injection rates led to increased TCE removal at lower ranges of air injection, but further increases at higher ranges of air injection did not increase the rate of removal, indicating a threshold removal rate had been reached; (3) increased initial concentration of dissolved TCE resulted in similar rates of removal; and (4) the removal of pure-phase TCE was difficult using a low air-injection rate, but higher air-injection rates led to easier removal.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 190
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   A CONCEPTUAL-MODEL OF FIELD BEHAVIOR OF AIR SPARGING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR APPLICATION [J].
AHLFELD, DP ;
DAHMANI, A ;
JI, W .
GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 1994, 14 (04) :132-139
[2]  
ARDITO CP, 1990, P PETR HYDR ORG CHEM, P281
[3]  
BRAIDA WJ, 1997, P 4 INT S IN SIT ON, V1, P187
[4]  
Bruell CJ, 1997, J SOIL CONTAM, V6, P169, DOI 10.1080/15320389709383555
[5]   LABORATORY STUDY OF AIR SPARGING - AIR-FLOW VISUALIZATION [J].
JI, W ;
DAHMANI, A ;
AHLFELD, DP ;
LIN, JD ;
HILL, E .
GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 1993, 13 (04) :115-126
[6]   Assessment of the contributions of volatilization and biodegradation to in situ air sparging performance [J].
Johnson, PC .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 32 (02) :276-281
[7]  
JOHNSON PC, 1997, P 4 INT IN SIT ON SI, V1, P135
[8]  
LEONARD WC, 1994, P PETR HYDR ORG CHEM, P349
[9]   AIR SPARGING IN A SANDY AQUIFER (FLORENCE, OREGON, USA) - ACTUAL AND APPARENT RADIUS OF INFLUENCE [J].
LUNDEGARD, PD ;
LABRECQUE, D .
JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 1995, 19 (01) :1-27
[10]   THE APPLICATION OF INSITU AIR SPARGING AS AN INNOVATIVE SOILS AND GROUND-WATER REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY [J].
MARLEY, MC ;
HAZEBROUCK, DJ ;
WALSH, MT .
GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 1992, 12 (02) :137-145