Comparisons of dN/dS are time dependent for closely related bacterial genomes

被引:309
作者
Rocha, EPC
Smith, JM
Hurst, LD
Holden, MTG
Cooper, JE
Smith, NH
Feil, EJ
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Biol & Biochem, Bath BA2 1AJ, Avon, England
[2] Univ Paris 06, Atelier Bioinformat, F-75005 Paris, France
[3] Inst Pasteur, Unite GGB, F-75015 Paris, France
[4] Wellcome Trust Sanger Inst, Cambridge CB10 1SA, England
[5] Vet Labs Agcy Weybridge, Weybridge KT15 3NB, Surrey, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
bacterial evolution; dN/dS ratio; purifying selection;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.08.037
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The ratio of non-synonymous (dN) to synonymous (dS) changes between taxa is frequently computed to assay the strength and direction of selection. Here we note that for comparisons between closely related strains and/or species a second parameter needs to be considered, namely the time since divergence of the two sequences under scrutiny. We demonstrate that a simple time lag model provides a general, parsimonious explanation of the extensive variation in the dN/dS ratio seen when comparing closely related bacterial genomes. We explore this model through simulation and comparative genomics, and suggest a role for hitch-hiking in the accumulation of non-synonymous mutations. We also note taxon-specific differences in the change of dN/dS over time, which may indicate variation in selection, or in population genetics parameters such as population size or the rate of recombination. The effect of comparing intra-species polymorphism and inter-species substitution, and the problems associated with these concepts for asexual prokaryotes, are also discussed. We conclude that, because of the critical effect of time since divergence, inter-taxa comparisons are only possible by comparing trajectories of dN/dS over time and it is not valid to compare taxa on the basis of single time points. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 235
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Silent nucleotide polymorphisms and a phyogeny for Mycobacterium tuberculosis [J].
Baker, L ;
Brown, T ;
Maiden, MC ;
Drobniewski, F .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 10 (09) :1568-1577
[2]   HETEROGENEITY OF GENOME SIZES AMONG NATURAL ISOLATES OF ESCHERICHIA-COLI [J].
BERGTHORSSON, U ;
OCHMAN, H .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 1995, 177 (20) :5784-5789
[3]   What are bacterial species? [J].
Cohan, FM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 56 :457-487
[4]   Multilocus sequence typing system for Campylobacter jejuni [J].
Dingle, KE ;
Colles, FM ;
Wareing, DRA ;
Ure, R ;
Fox, AJ ;
Bolton, FE ;
Bootsma, HJ ;
Willems, RJL ;
Urwin, R ;
Maiden, MCJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 39 (01) :14-23
[5]   Small change: Keeping pace with microevolution [J].
Feil, EJ .
NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 2 (06) :483-495
[6]   How clonal is Staphylococcus aureus? [J].
Feil, EJ ;
Cooper, JE ;
Grundmann, H ;
Robinson, DA ;
Enright, MC ;
Berendt, T ;
Peacock, SJ ;
Smith, JM ;
Murphy, M ;
Spratt, BG ;
Moore, CE ;
Day, NPJ .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 2003, 185 (11) :3307-3316
[7]   Gradual evolution in bacteria:: evidence from Bacillus systematics [J].
Feldgarden, M ;
Byrd, N ;
Cohan, FM .
MICROBIOLOGY-SGM, 2003, 149 :3565-3573
[8]  
FELSENSTEIN J, 1985, AM NAT, V125, P1, DOI 10.1086/284325
[9]   Whole-genome comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical and laboratory strains [J].
Fleischmann, RD ;
Alland, D ;
Eisen, JA ;
Carpenter, L ;
White, O ;
Peterson, J ;
DeBoy, R ;
Dodson, R ;
Gwinn, M ;
Haft, D ;
Hickey, E ;
Kolonay, JF ;
Nelson, WC ;
Umayam, LA ;
Ermolaeva, M ;
Salzberg, SL ;
Delcher, A ;
Utterback, T ;
Weidman, J ;
Khouri, H ;
Gill, J ;
Mikula, A ;
Bishai, W ;
Jacobs, WR ;
Venter, JC ;
Fraser, CM .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 2002, 184 (19) :5479-5490
[10]   Genome-wide patterns of nucleotide substitution reveal stringent functional constraints on the protein sequences of thermophiles [J].
Friedman, R ;
Drake, JW ;
Hughes, AL .
GENETICS, 2004, 167 (03) :1507-1512