The bystander response in C3H 10T1/2 cells: The influence of cell-to-cell contact

被引:60
作者
Mitchell, SA [1 ]
Randers-Pehrson, G [1 ]
Brenner, DJ [1 ]
Hall, EJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Ctr Radiol Res, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1667/RR3137
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Although radiation-induced heritable damage in mammalian cells was thought to result from the direct interaction of radiation with DNA, it is now accepted that biological effects may occur in cells that were not themselves traversed by ionizing radiation but are close to those that were. However, little is known about the mechanism underlying such a bystander effect, although cell-to-cell communication is thought to be of importance. Previous work using the Columbia microbeam demonstrated a significant bystander effect for clonogenic survival and oncogenic transformation in C3H 10T1/2 cells. The present study was undertaken to assess the importance of the degree of cell-to-cell contact at the time of irradiation on the magnitude of this bystander effect by varying the cell density. When 10% of cells were exposed to a range of 2-12 alpha particles, a significantly greater number of cells (P < 0.0001) were inactivated when cells were irradiated at high density (>90% in contact with neighbors) than at low density (<10% in contact). In addition, the oncogenic transformation frequency was significantly higher in high-density cultures (P < 0.0004). These results suggest that when a cell is hit by radiation, the transmission of the bystander signal through cell-to-cell contact is an important mediator of the effect, implicating the involvement of intracellular communication through gap junctions. (C) 2004 by Radiation Research Society.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 401
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Direct evidence for the participation of gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals from α-particle irradiated to nonirradiated cells [J].
Azzam, EI ;
de Toledo, SM ;
Little, JB .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (02) :473-478
[2]   Cellular communication and bystander effects: a critical review for modelling low-dose radiation action [J].
Ballarini, F ;
Biaggi, M ;
Ottolenghi, A ;
Sapora, O .
MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 2002, 501 (1-2) :1-12
[3]  
Ballarini Francesca, 2002, Journal of Radiological Protection, V22, pA39, DOI 10.1088/0952-4746/22/3A/307
[4]   Direct evidence for a bystander effect of ionizing radiation in primary human fibroblasts [J].
Belyakov, OV ;
Malcolmson, AM ;
Folkard, M ;
Prise, KM ;
Michael, BD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 84 (05) :674-679
[5]  
Brenner DJ, 2001, RADIAT RES, V155, P402, DOI 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)155[0402:TBEIRO]2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   Disruption of gap junctions in toxicity and carcinogenicity [J].
Chipman, JK ;
Mally, A ;
Edwards, GO .
TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 71 (02) :146-153
[8]   Singlet oxygen-mediated damage to proteins and its consequences [J].
Davies, MJ .
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2003, 305 (03) :761-770
[9]  
Khvostunov Igor K., 2002, Journal of Radiological Protection, V22, pA33, DOI 10.1088/0952-4746/22/3A/306
[10]   Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects: related inflammatory-type responses to radiation-induced stress and injury? A review [J].
Lorimore, SA ;
Wright, EG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 2003, 79 (01) :15-25