Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of telmisartan and enalapril, with the potential addition of frusemide, in moderate-renal failure patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension

被引:18
作者
Hannedouche, T
Chanard, J
Baumelou, B
机构
[1] Hop Civil, Serv Nephrol, F-67091 Strasbourg, France
[2] Hop Maison Blanche, Serv Nephrol, Reims, France
[3] Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH & Co KG, Clin Res Unit, Reims, France
关键词
telmisartan; renal safety; creatinine clearance; enalapril; hypertension;
D O I
10.3317/jraas.2001.039
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
The effect on renal function and efficacy of the angiotensin II AT(1)-receptor blocker (ARB), telmisartan, were compared with those of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, enalapril, for the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 95-114 mmHg) in the presence of moderate renal failure (creatinine clearance [Ccr] 30-80 ml/minute). The study was multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy and active-controlled in design, with patients randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive telmisartan or enalapril. After a two-week placebo run-in period, the 71 eligible patients received either telmisartan, 40 mg, or enalapril, 10 mg, once-daily for four weeks. Thereafter, doses were titrated to telmisartan 80 mg or enalapril 20 mg once-daily if supine trough DBP was still greater than or equal to90 mmHg. After a further four weeks, dose titration was again performed, as required, to telmisartan, 80 mg, or enalapril, 20 mg, or frusemide was given in addition if the double dose was already being administered. Mean Ccr decreases of 4.6% for telmisartan and 2.8% for enalapril were not clinically significant. Adverse events occurred in 12 (26.7%) telmisartan-treated patients and in 12 (46.2%) patients receiving enalapril. The mean reduction in supine trough DBP from baseline to the last available value was 12.5 mmHg for telmisartan, compared with 11.9 mmHg for enalapril. A full (reduction of greater than or equal to10 mmHg) or partial (reduction of 7-9 mmHg) response occurred in 78% of telmisartan patients and 65% of enalapril patients. In the enalapril group, 43% of patients required frusemide, compared with 29% of those in the telmisartan group. In conclusion, telmisartan lacks detrimental effect on renal function, is effective in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension in patients with moderate renal failure, and is comparable to enalapril.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 254
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, PHYS DESK REF, P1723
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, ARCH INTERN MED, V157, P2413, DOI [10.1001/archinte.1997.00440420033005, DOI 10.1001/ARCHINTE.1997.00440420033005]
[4]  
BRUNNER HR, 1990, ANGIOTENSIN CONVERTI, P732
[5]  
Burnier M, 1994, Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens, V3, P537, DOI 10.1097/00041552-199409000-00011
[6]   DETERIORATION IN RENAL-FUNCTION ASSOCIATED WITH ANGIOTENSIN CONVERTING-ENZYME-INHIBITOR THERAPY IS NOT ALWAYS REVERSIBLE [J].
DEVOY, MAB ;
TOMSON, CRV ;
EDMUNDS, ME ;
FEEHALLY, J ;
WALLS, J .
JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 232 (06) :493-498
[7]  
*FOOD DRUG ADM, 2000, FED REGISTER, V65, P4872
[8]   THE ANTIPROTEINURIC EFFECT OF ACE-INHIBITION MEDIATED BY INTERFERENCE IN THE RENIN-ANGIOTENSIN SYSTEM [J].
GANSEVOORT, RT ;
DEZEEUW, D ;
DEJONG, PE .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 45 (03) :861-867
[10]   Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on the progression of nondiabetic renal disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials [J].
Giatras, I ;
Lau, J ;
Levey, AS .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 127 (05) :337-+