Environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles-a review

被引:378
作者
Hawkins, Troy R. [1 ]
Gausen, Ola Moa [1 ]
Stromman, Anders Hammer [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, Ind Ecol Program, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Batteries; Electric vehicles; Greenhouse gas; Plug-in hybrid; Transportation; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PLUG-IN HYBRID; ENERGY ANALYSIS; LITHIUM-ION; BATTERIES; EMISSIONS; MODEL; COST; SIMULATION; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-012-0440-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A literature review is undertaken to understand how well existing studies of the environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles (EV) address the full life cycle of these technologies. Results of studies are synthesized to compare the global warming potential (GWP) of different EV and internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV) options. Other impacts are compared; however, data availability limits the extent to which this could be accomplished. We define what should be included in a complete, state-of-the-art environmental assessment of hybrid and electric vehicles considering components and life cycle stages, emission categories, impact categories, and resource use and compare the content of 51 environmental assessments of hybrid and electric vehicles to our definition. Impact assessment results associated with full life cycle inventories (LCI) are compared for GWP as well as emissions of other pollutants. GWP results by life cycle stage and key parameters are extracted and used to perform a meta-analysis quantifying the impacts of vehicle options. Few studies provide a full LCI for EVs together with assessment of multiple impacts. Research has focused on well to wheel studies comparing fossil fuel and electricity use as the use phase has been seen to dominate the life cycle of vehicles. Only very recently have studies begun to better address production impacts. Apart from batteries, very few studies provide transparent LCIs of other key EV drivetrain components. Estimates of EV energy use in the literature span a wide range, 0.10-0.24 kWh/km. Similarly, battery and vehicle lifetime plays an important role in results, yet lifetime assumptions range between 150,000-300,000 km. CO2 and GWP are the most frequently reported results. Compiled results suggest the GWP of EVs powered by coal electricity falls between small and large conventional vehicles while EVs powered by natural gas or low-carbon energy sources perform better than the most efficient ICEVs. EV results in regions dependant on coal electricity demonstrated a trend toward increased SO (x) emissions compared to fuel use by ICEVs. Moving forward research should focus on providing consensus around a transparent inventory for production of electric vehicles, appropriate electricity grid mix assumptions, the implications of EV adoption on the existing grid, and means of comparing vehicle on the basis of common driving and charging patterns. Although EVs appear to demonstrate decreases in GWP compared to conventional ICEVs, high efficiency ICEVs and grid-independent hybrid electric vehicles perform better than EVs using coal-fired electricity.
引用
收藏
页码:997 / 1014
页数:18
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]   Metal resource constraints for electric-vehicle batteries [J].
Andersson, BA ;
Råde, I .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 6 (05) :297-324
[2]  
ANL, 2009, GREENH GAS REG EM EN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, MOB 2030 M CHALL SUS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, MINERAL COMMODITY SU, DOI DOI 10.3133/MCS2022
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, COMP BENEFITS IMPACT
[6]  
[Anonymous], COMP BEN IMP HYBR EL
[7]  
[Anonymous], MAK SWED OIL FREE SO
[8]  
Axsen J., 2008, BATTERIES PLUG IN HY
[9]  
Bandivadekar A.P., 2008, Evaluating the Impact of Advanced Vehicle and Fuel Technologies in US Light-Duty Vehicle Fleet
[10]  
Baptista P, 2009, EVS24 STAV NORW