Potential savings from increased use of generic drugs in the elderly: what the experience of Medicaid and other insurance programs means for a Medicare drug benefit

被引:38
作者
Fischer, MA [1 ]
Avorn, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Med Sch,Dept Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02120 USA
关键词
generic drugs; Medicaid; health care costs; health insurance;
D O I
10.1002/pds.872
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Generic medications provide the same clinical effect at lower cost than brand name drugs but little is known about the extent to which such savings are achieved in drug benefit programs serving the elderly. Methods Using patient-level claims data for participants aged 65 or more in one state Medicaid program and in a non-Medicaid drug insurance program for the elderly, we compared the expenditures in each program for brand name prescriptions with the amount that would have been paid for generic versions of the same agents. We then estimated potential savings from increased use of substitutable brand name drugs. Results There was an unrealized annual savings of $3.4 million (3.6% of total drug expenditure) in the Medicaid program studied and $13.7 million (9.5% of total drug expenditure) in the non-Medicaid drug insurance program for the elderly, with corresponding reductions in mean annual per-patient drug costs. Conclusions More widespread use of generic medications represents an important source of unrealized savings in drug coverage programs for the elderly. The Medicaid program limits the excess spending on brand name drugs by imposing pricing restrictions, but many non-Medicaid programs could realize even larger savings from reducing the use of brand name drugs when identical eneric products are available. These findings offer some insight into the potential expense of a Medicare prescription drug benefit. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 214
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Changing physician prescribing behavior: A low-cost administrative policy that reduced the use of brand name nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [J].
Ahluwalia, JS ;
Weisenberger, ML ;
Bernard, AM ;
McNagny, SE .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1996, 25 (06) :668-672
[2]   CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF THE SUBSTITUTION OF DIFFERENT BRANDS OF SUSTAINED-RELEASE THEOPHYLLINE [J].
BAKER, JR ;
MOESSNER, H ;
GONZALEZ, U ;
GRABENSTEIN, J ;
RENARD, R ;
DENAPOLI, T ;
SUMMERS, R ;
SCHUSTER, B .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1988, 81 (04) :664-673
[3]   A physician survey on generic drugs and substitution or critical dose medications [J].
Banahan, BF ;
Kolassa, EM .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 157 (18) :2080-2088
[4]  
BENET LZ, 1995, PHARMACOTHERAPY, V15, P433
[5]   Drug coverage and drug purchases by medicare beneficiaries with hypertension [J].
Blustein, J .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2000, 19 (02) :219-230
[6]  
CRIPPEN DL, 2002, TESTIMONY PROJECTION, V25
[7]   Bioequivalence of generic and brand-name levothyroxine products in the treatment of hypothyroidism [J].
Dong, BJ ;
Hauck, WW ;
Gambertoglio, JG ;
Gee, L ;
White, JR ;
Bubp, JL ;
Greenspan, FS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (15) :1205-1213
[8]  
*H J KAISER FAM FD, 2001, PRESCR DRUG COV MED, V42
[9]  
*HCFA, 1998, MED VEND PAYM TYP SE, V2000
[10]  
*HCFA, 2002, NAT HLTH CAR EXP PRO, V2002