Effect of Initial Tibial Resection Thickness on Outcomes of Revision UKA

被引:17
作者
Schwarzkopf, Ran [1 ]
Mikhael, Bassem [1 ]
Li, Ling [2 ]
Josephs, Lee [2 ]
Scott, Richard D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, New England Baptist Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; REPLACEMENT; CANDIDATES; CONVERSION; ARTHRITIS;
D O I
10.3928/01477447-20130327-14
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
The frequency of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) procedures has increased rapidly over the past decade. Some conflicting evidence exists concerning UKA revision. Some studies have found UKA revisions to be comparable with primary total knee arthroplasty, whereas others have found that UKA revisions require a higher need for tibial stems and augments and have more complications and worse results. This study seeks to determine the effect of a conservative tibial resection in UKA on the ease of revision and its outcomes in a consecutive patient cohort. Thirty-five patients underwent 37 conversions of a medial UKA to a total knee arthroplasty. Clinical, functional, and radiological data were evaluated. At revision, a primary total knee arthroplasty implant was used in 24 (88.8%) patients who underwent a conservative tibial resection during their UKA compared with only 3 (30%) patients who underwent an aggressive tibial resection (P<.001). The odds ratio of needing an augment or stem was 26.8 (95% confidence interval, 3.71-194) when an aggressive resection was performed compared with a conservative resection during the UKA. The results indicate that revision of a medial UKA can be comparable with a primary TKA when a conservative tibial resection is performed at the time of the primary UKA. It is possible to preoperatively predict which patients might need the use of augmentation and stems during UKA revision. This data should guide surgeons to strive for the most conservative UKA tibial resection possible in patients undergoing medial UKA.
引用
收藏
页码:E409 / E414
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leading to revision [J].
Aleto, Thomas J. ;
Berend, Michael E. ;
Ritter, Merrill A. ;
Faris, Philip M. ;
Meneghini, R. Michael .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2008, 23 (02) :159-163
[2]
Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement - A three to ten-year follow-up study [J].
Argenson, JNA ;
Chevrol-Benkeddache, Y ;
Aubaniac, JM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (12) :2235-2239
[3]
BARRETT WP, 1987, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V69A, P1328
[4]
Revision surgery after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty -: A study of 35 cases [J].
Böhm, I ;
Landsiedl, F .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2000, 15 (08) :982-989
[5]
Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee - Clinical and technical considerations [J].
Chakrabarty, G ;
Newman, JH ;
Ackroyd, CE .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1998, 13 (02) :191-196
[6]
CHESNUT WJ, 1991, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P146
[7]
INSALL JN, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P13
[8]
Current concepts review - Unicompartmental arthritis of the knee [J].
Iorio, R ;
Healy, WL .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A (07) :1351-1364
[9]
CURRENT CONCEPTS REVIEW - UNICONDYLAR KNEE ARTHROPLASTY [J].
KOZINN, SC ;
SCOTT, R .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1989, 71A (01) :145-150
[10]
UNICOMPARTMENTAL TIBIOFEMORAL RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY [J].
LASKIN, RS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1978, 60 (02) :182-185