11C-Acetate as a new biomarker for PET/CT in patients with multiple myeloma: initial staging and postinduction response assessment

被引:60
作者
Lin, Chieh [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ho, Chi-Lai [4 ]
Ng, Shu-Hang [3 ,5 ]
Wang, Po-Nan [3 ,6 ]
Huang, Yenlin [3 ,7 ]
Lin, Yu-Chun [3 ,5 ]
Tang, Tzung-Chih [3 ,6 ]
Tsai, Shu-Fan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rahmouni, Alain [8 ]
Yen, Tzu-Chen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Gueishan 33305, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Mol Imaging Ctr, Gueishan 33305, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
[4] Hong Kong Sanat & Hosp, Dept Nucl Med & Positron Emiss Tomog, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
[6] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
[7] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Anat Pathol, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
[8] CHU Henri Mondor, AP HP, Dept Radiol, Grp Henri Mondor Albert Chenevier, F-94010 Creteil, France
关键词
PET/CT; C-11-Acetate; F-18-FDG; Multiple myeloma; Staging; Response assessment; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; WHOLE-BODY MRI; F-18-FDG PET; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; RECURRENT DISEASE; PROSTATE-CANCER; PROGNOSIS; DIAGNOSIS; FEATURES; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-013-2520-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
We investigated the potential value of C-11-acetate (ACT) PET/CT in characterizing multiple myeloma (MM) compared with F-18-FDG PET/CT. Bone marrow histological and whole-body (WB) MRI findings served as the reference standards. In this prospective study, 15 untreated MM patients (10 men and 5 women, age range 48-69 years) underwent dual-tracer C-11-ACT and F-18-FDG PET/CT and WB MRI for pretreatment staging, and 13 of them had repeated examinations after induction therapy. Diffuse and focal bone marrow uptake was assessed by visual and quantitative analyses, including measurement of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Between-group differences and correlations were assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test and the Pearson test. At staging, all 15 patients had diffuse myeloma involvement upon bone marrow examination with 30-90 % of plasma cell infiltrates. Diffuse infiltration was detected in all of them (100 %) using C-11-ACT with a positive correlation between bone marrow uptake values and percentages of plasma cell infiltrates (r = +0.63, p = 0.01). In contrast, a diagnosis of diffuse infiltration could be established using F-18-FDG in only six patients (40 %). Focal lesions were shown in 13 patients on both C-11-ACT PET/CT and WB MRI, and in 10 patients on F-18-FDG PET/CT. Focal lesions demonstrated C-11-ACT uptake with a mean SUVmax of 11.4 +/- 3.3 (range 4.6-19.6, n = 59), which was significantly higher than the F-18-FDG uptake (mean SUVmax 6.6 +/- 3.1, range 2.3-13.7, n = 29; p < 0.0001). After treatment, the diffuse bone marrow C-11-ACT uptake showed a mean SUVmax reduction of 66 % in patients with at least a very good partial response versus 34 % in those with at most a partial response only (p = 0.01). PET/CT using C-11-ACT as a biomarker showed a higher detection rate for both diffuse and focal myeloma lesions at diagnosis than using F-18-FDG, and may be valuable for response assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 49
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]
F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma [J].
Bartel, Twyla B. ;
Haessler, Jeff ;
Brown, Tracy L. Y. ;
Shaughnessy, John D., Jr. ;
van Rhee, Frits ;
Anaissie, Elias ;
Alpe, Terri ;
Angtuaco, Edgardo ;
Walker, Ronald ;
Epstein, Joshua ;
Crowley, John ;
Barlogie, Bart .
BLOOD, 2009, 114 (10) :2068-2076
[2]
Role of MRI for the diagnosis and prognosis of multiple myeloma [J].
Baur-Melnyk, A ;
Buhmann, S ;
Dürr, HR ;
Reiser, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 55 (01) :56-63
[3]
Whole-body MRI versus whole-body MDCT for staging of multiple myeloma [J].
Baur-Melnyk, Andrea ;
Buhmann, Sonja ;
Becker, Christoph ;
Schoenberg, Stefan Oswald ;
Lang, Nicola ;
Bartl, Reiner ;
Reiser, Maximilian Ferdinand .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (04) :1097-1104
[4]
Value of FDG PET in the assessment of patients with multiple myeloma [J].
Bredella, MA ;
Steinbach, L ;
Caputo, G ;
Segall, G ;
Hawkins, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (04) :1199-1204
[5]
11C-Acetate and 18F-FDG PET/CT for Clinical Staging and Selection of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma for Liver Transplantation on the Basis of Milan Criteria: Surgeon's Perspective [J].
Cheung, Tan To ;
Ho, Chi Lai ;
Lo, Chung Mau ;
Chen, Sirong ;
Chan, See Ching ;
Chok, Kenneth S. H. ;
Fung, James Y. ;
Chan, Albert Chi Yan ;
Sharr, William ;
Yau, Thomas ;
Poon, Ronnie T. P. ;
Fan, Sheung Tat .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2013, 54 (02) :192-200
[6]
Multiple myeloma:: Molecular imaging with 11C-methionine PET/CT -: Initial experience [J].
Dankerl, Anja ;
Liebisch, Peter ;
Glatting, Gerhard ;
Friesen, Claudia ;
Blumstein, Norbert M. ;
Kocot, Darius ;
Wendl, Christiane ;
Bunjes, Donald ;
Reske, Sven N. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 242 (02) :498-508
[7]
18F-FDG PET/CT for detection and localization of residual or recurrent disease in patients with multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation [J].
Derlin, Thorsten ;
Weber, Christoph ;
Habermann, Christian R. ;
Herrmann, Jochen ;
Wisotzki, Christian ;
Ayuk, Francis ;
Wolschke, Christine ;
Klutmann, Susanne ;
Kroeger, Nicolaus .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2012, 39 (03) :493-500
[8]
International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma [J].
Durie, B. G. M. ;
Harousseau, J-L ;
Miguel, J. S. ;
Blade, J. ;
Barlogie, B. ;
Anderson, K. ;
Gertz, M. ;
Dimopoulos, M. ;
Westin, J. ;
Sonneveld, P. ;
Ludwig, H. ;
Gahrton, G. ;
Beksac, M. ;
Crowley, J. ;
Belch, A. ;
Boccadaro, M. ;
Turesson, I. ;
Joshua, D. ;
Vesole, D. ;
Kyle, R. ;
Alexanian, R. ;
Tricot, G. ;
Attal, M. ;
Merlini, G. ;
Powles, R. ;
Richardson, P. ;
Shimizu, K. ;
Tosi, P. ;
Morgan, G. ;
Rajkumar, S. V. .
LEUKEMIA, 2006, 20 (09) :1467-1473
[9]
Durie BGM, 2002, J NUCL MED, V43, P1457
[10]
DURIE BGM, 1975, CANCER, V36, P842, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197509)36:3<842::AID-CNCR2820360303>3.0.CO