Comparison of Fulvestrant versus tamoxifen for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women previously untreated with endocrine therapy: A multinational, double-blind, randomized trial

被引:277
作者
Howell, A
Robertson, JE
Abram, P
Lichinitser, MR
Elledge, R
Bajetta, E
Watanabe, T
Morris, C
Webster, A
Dimery, I
Osborne, CK
机构
[1] Christie Hosp & Holt Radium Inst, Manchester M20 9BX, Lancs, England
[2] City Hosp, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
[3] Belvoir Pk Hosp, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[4] Russian Acad Med Sci, Canc Res Ctr, Moscow, Russia
[5] Baylor Coll Med, Breast Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Methodist Hosp, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[7] Ist Nazl Tumori, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[8] Natl Canc Ctr, Tokyo, Japan
[9] AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2004.02.112
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of fulvestrant (Faslodex; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LIP, Wilmington, DE), a new estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist that downregulates ER and has no agonist effects, versus tamoxifen, an antiestrogen with agonist and antagonist effects, for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Patients and Methods In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial, patients with metastatic/locally advanced breast cancer previously untreated for advanced disease were randomly assigned to receive either fulvestrant (250 mg, via intramuscular injection, once monthly; n = 313) or tannoxifen (20 mg, orally, once daily; n = 274). Patients' tumors were positive for ER (ER+) and/or progesterone receptor (PgR+), or had an unknown receptor status. Results At a median follow-up of 14.5 months, there was no significant difference between fulvestrant and tannoxifen for the primary end point of time to progression (TTP; median TTP, 6.8 months and 8.3 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% Cl, 0.98 to 1.44; P =.088). In a prospectively planned subset analysis of patients with known l and/or PgR+ tumors (-78%), median TTP was 8.2 months for fulvestrant and 8.3 months for tannoxifen (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% Cl, 0.89 to 1.36; P =.39). The objective response rate for the overall population was 31.6% with fulvestrant and 33.9% with tamoxifen, and 33.2% and 31.1 %, respectively, in the known hormone receptor-positive subgroup. Both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusion In the overall population, between-group differences in efficacy end points favored tamoxifen, and statistical noninferiority of fulvestrant could not be demonstrated. However, in patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors, fulvestrant had similar efficacy to tannoxifen and was well tolerated.
引用
收藏
页码:1605 / 1613
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Progesterone receptor status significantly improves outcome prediction over estrogen receptor status alone for adjuvant endocrine therapy in two large breast cancer databases
    Bardou, VJ
    Arpino, G
    Elledge, RM
    Osborne, CK
    Clark, GM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (10) : 1973 - 1979
  • [2] Anastrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in 668 postmenopausal women:: Results of the tamoxifen or arimidex randomized group efficacy and tolerability study
    Bonneterre, J
    Thürlimann, B
    Robertson, JFR
    Krzakowski, M
    Mauriac, L
    Koralewski, P
    Vergote, I
    Webster, A
    Steinberg, M
    von Euler, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (22) : 3748 - 3757
  • [3] Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument
    Brady, MJ
    Cella, DF
    Mo, F
    Bonomi, AE
    Tulsky, DS
    Lloyd, SR
    Deasy, S
    Cobleigh, M
    Shiomoto, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (03) : 974 - 986
  • [4] THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CANCER-THERAPY SCALE - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE GENERAL MEASURE
    CELLA, DF
    TULSKY, DS
    GRAY, G
    SARAFIAN, B
    LINN, E
    BONOMI, A
    SILBERMAN, M
    YELLEN, SB
    WINICOUR, P
    BRANNON, J
    ECKBERG, K
    LLOYD, S
    PURL, S
    BLENDOWSKI, C
    GOODMAN, M
    BARNICLE, M
    STEWART, I
    MCHALE, M
    BONOMI, P
    KAPLAN, E
    TAYLOR, S
    THOMAS, CR
    HARRIS, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (03) : 570 - 579
  • [5] Clarke M, 1998, LANCET, V351, P1451
  • [6] ERIKSTEIN B, 2001, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V20, P69
  • [7] Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: Report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study
    Fisher, B
    Costantino, JP
    Wickerham, DL
    Redmond, CK
    Kavanah, M
    Cronin, WM
    Vogel, V
    Robidoux, A
    Dimitrov, N
    Atkins, J
    Daly, M
    Wieand, S
    Tan-Chiu, E
    Ford, L
    Wolmark, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (18) : 1371 - 1388
  • [8] Horny C, 1996, MED CARE, V34, P234
  • [9] Fulvestrant, formerly ICI 182,780, is as effective as anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing after prior endocrine treatment
    Howell, A
    Robertson, JFR
    Albano, JQ
    Aschermannova, A
    Mauriac, L
    Kleeberg, UR
    Vergote, I
    Erikstein, B
    Webster, A
    Morris, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (16) : 3396 - 3403
  • [10] USE OF TAMOXIFEN FOR BREAST-CANCER - 28 YEARS LATER
    JAIYESIMI, IA
    BUZDAR, AU
    DECKER, DA
    HORTOBAGYI, GN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (02) : 513 - 529