Abdominal wall hernia repair: a comparison of Permacol® and Surgisis® grafts in a rat hernia model

被引:48
作者
Ayubi, F. S. [1 ]
Armstrong, P. J. [1 ]
Mattia, M. S. [2 ]
Parker, D. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Eisenhower Army Med Ctr, Gen Surg Serv, Ft Gordon, GA 30905 USA
[2] Eisenhower Army Med Ctr, Dept Clin Invest, Ft Gordon, GA 30905 USA
关键词
Surgisis; Permacol; Abdominal wall reconstruction; Hernia; Mesh; Collagen; Porcine;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-008-0359-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background This study compared two porcine-derived grafts Permacol (Tissue Science Laboratory, Covington, GA, USA) and Surgisis (Cook Surgical, Bloomington, IN, USA) in terms of strength of incorporation (SOI), incorporation of host tissue, and adhesion formation using a rat model. Methods A prospective randomized study using 48 Sprague-Dawley rats. A standardized 1.5 x 5 cm fascial defect was created and repaired with either Permacol or Surgisis grafts. The rats were then sacrificed at 3, 14, 28, or 60 days. The specimens were examined for SOI, neovascularization, collagen deposition, collagen organization, and adhesion formation. Results Surgisis had significantly greater SOI than Permacol at 28 (0.115 vs. 0.0754 Mpa) and 60 days (0.131 vs. 0.635 Mpa). Surgisis had significantly more collagen deposition and neovascularization than Permacol at 60 days. The area of adhesions was not significantly different between Surgisis and Permacol. Conclusion Surgisis is superior to Permacol in terms of SOI and tissue ingrowth at 60 days. Furthermore, Surgisis strengthened over time whereas Permacol decreased in strength.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 378
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Burger JWA, 2004, ANN SURG, V240, P578
[2]  
Campanelli G, 2004, Hernia, V8, P190
[3]   Use of porcine dermal collagen graft (Permacol) for hernia repair in contaminated fields [J].
Catena F. ;
Ansaloni L. ;
Gazzotti F. ;
Gagliardi S. ;
Di Saverio S. ;
D'Alessandro L. ;
Pinna A.D. .
Hernia, 2007, 11 (1) :57-60
[4]  
Franklin M E Jr, 2004, Hernia, V8, P186
[5]   Short-term outcomes with small intestinal submucosa for ventral abdominal hernia [J].
Helton, WS ;
Fisichella, PM ;
Berger, R ;
Horgan, S ;
Espat, N ;
Abcarian, H .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2005, 140 (06) :549-560
[6]   Technique and outcomes of abdominal incisional hernia repair using a synthetic composite mesh: A report of 455 cases [J].
Iannitti, David A. ;
Hope, William W. ;
Norton, H. James ;
Lincourt, Amy E. ;
Millikan, Keith ;
Fenoglio, Michael E. ;
Moskowitz, Mark .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 206 (01) :83-88
[7]  
JONES JW, 1989, AM SURGEON, V55, P73
[8]   Abdominal wall hernia repair: A comparison of sepramesh and parietex composite mesh in a rabbit hernia model [J].
Judge, Timothy W. ;
Parker, David M. ;
Dinsmore, Robert C. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 204 (02) :276-281
[9]  
Klinge U, 1996, LANGENBECK ARCH CHIR, V381, P323
[10]   Tensile strength comparison of small intestinal submucosa body wall repair [J].
Ko, Rainier ;
Kazacos, Evelyn A. ;
Snyder, Scott ;
Ernst, David M. J. ;
Lantz, Gary C. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 135 (01) :9-17