Regionalism in standards: good or bad for trade?

被引:83
作者
Chen, Maggie Xiaoyang [1 ]
Mattoo, Aaditya [1 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Econ, Washington, DC 20052 USA
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE | 2008年 / 41卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.00488.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Regional agreements on standards have been largely ignored by economists and blessed by multilateral trade rules. Using a constructed panel data that identifies the different types of agreements at the industry level, we find that such agreements increase the trade between participating countries but not necessarily with the rest of the world. Harmonization of standards may reduce the exports of excluded countries, especially in markets that have raised the stringency of standards. Mutual recognition agreements are more uniformly trade promoting unless they contain restrictive rules of origin, in which case intra-regional trade increases at the expense of imports from other countries.
引用
收藏
页码:838 / 863
页数:26
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle [J].
Anderson, JE ;
van Wincoop, E .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (01) :170-192
[2]  
ANDERSON JE, 1979, AM ECON REV, V69, P106
[3]   Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade? [J].
Baier, Scott L. ;
Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 71 (01) :72-95
[4]   Economic determinants of free trade agreements [J].
Baier, SL ;
Bergstrand, JH .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 64 (01) :29-63
[5]  
BAIER SL, 2007, ESTIMATING EFF UNPUB
[6]  
Baldwin R., 2000, 2574 CEPR
[7]   Market access, economic geography and comparative advantage: an empirical test [J].
Davis, DR ;
Weinstein, DE .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 59 (01) :1-23
[8]  
ESSAJI A, 2006, TECHNICAL REGU UNPUB
[9]  
*EUR COMM, 1998, TECHN BARR TRAD, V1
[10]   The economic significance of national border effects [J].
Evans, CL .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (04) :1291-1312