Background noise decreases both prepulse elicitation and inhibition of acoustic startle blink responding

被引:22
作者
Blumenthal, TD [1 ]
Noto, JV [1 ]
Fox, MA [1 ]
Franklin, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Dept Psychol, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
关键词
startle; blink; background noise; PPI;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.10.001
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Prepulse inhibition of startle (PPI) has proved to be useful in distinguishing between schizophrenia patients and normal controls, although not all studies in this area find such group differences. One reason for this inconsistency may be the fact that some research labs present the startle eliciting and inhibiting stimuli over a steady background noise (70 dB), whereas others present stimuli in ambient noise conditions (30-56 dB). The present study tested the impact of background noise (30, 50, and 70 dB) on PPI in normal college adults, with prepulses at intensities of 75, 80, and 85 dB, and with prepulse rise times of 1 or 10 ms. Background noise decreased the amount of PPI caused by the prepulses, and also decreased the ability of the prepulses to themselves elicit blink responses. We conclude that background noise interferes with the processing of the prepulse, attenuating its effect as both an elicitor and inhibitor of the startle reflex. By elevating the difficulty of prepulse processing, this attenuation may be a necessary condition for observing differences in PPI between patient and control groups. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 179
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STARTLE MODIFICATION
[2]  
Berg W. K., 1999, Startle Modification: Implications For Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, and Clinical Science, eds, P21
[3]   Committee report: Guidelines for human startle eyeblink electromyographic studies [J].
Blumenthal, TD ;
Cuthbert, BN ;
Filion, DL ;
Hackley, S ;
Lipp, OV ;
Van Boxtel, A .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 42 (01) :1-15
[4]   A comparison of several methods used to quantify prepulse inhibition of eyeblink responding [J].
Blumenthal, TD ;
Elden, A ;
Flaten, MA .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 41 (02) :326-332
[5]   PREPULSE RISE TIME AND STARTLE REFLEX MODIFICATION - DIFFERENT EFFECTS FOR DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS PREPULSES [J].
BLUMENTHAL, TD ;
LEVEY, BJ .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 26 (02) :158-165
[6]   Inhibition of the human startle response is affected by both prepulse intensity and eliciting stimulus intensity [J].
Blumenthal, TD .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 44 (02) :85-104
[7]   THE STARTLE EYEBLINK RESPONSE TO LOW INTENSITY ACOUSTIC STIMULI [J].
BLUMENTHAL, TD ;
GOODE, CT .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 28 (03) :296-306
[8]   THE STARTLE RESPONSE TO ACOUSTIC STIMULI NEAR STARTLE THRESHOLD - EFFECTS OF STIMULUS RISE AND FALL TIME, DURATION, AND INTENSITY [J].
BLUMENTHAL, TD .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 25 (05) :607-611
[9]   STIMULUS RISE TIME, INTENSITY, AND BANDWIDTH EFFECTS ON ACOUSTIC STARTLE AMPLITUDE AND PROBABILITY [J].
BLUMENTHAL, TD ;
BERG, WK .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 23 (06) :635-641
[10]   PREPULSE INHIBITION OF THE STARTLE EYEBLINK AS AN INDICATOR OF TEMPORAL SUMMATION [J].
BLUMENTHAL, TD .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1995, 57 (04) :487-494