Classification of PM10 distributions in Taiwan

被引:38
作者
Lu, HC
Chang, CL
Hsieh, JC
机构
[1] HungKuang Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Taichung 433, Taiwan
[2] Yuanpei Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Environm Engn & Hlth, Hsinchu, Taiwan
关键词
self-organizing maps; lognormal distribution; hierarchical clustering; K-means; air-quality basins;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.10.051
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Daily average PM10 concentrations of 71 stations in Taiwan in wintertime (October to March) and summertime periods (April to September) were fitted individually by a lognormal distribution for a 2 yr period (2001 to 2002). The distribution parameters (geometric mean and geometric standard deviation) in wintertime were used to determine the air-quality basins for PM10 by utilizing three clustering techniques, viz. of hierarchical clustering (Ward's method), non-hierarchical clustering (K-means) and two-level approach (self-organizing maps neural network, then K-means clustering). All three techniques suggested that 71 air-monitoring stations in Taiwan can be divided into five air-quality basins which are located in northern, central, eastern, southwestern and southern Taiwan, respectively. The sequence of PM10 pollution levels in the five basins is southern Taiwan > southwestern Taiwan > central Taiwan > northern Taiwan > eastern Taiwan. Geometric means and geometric standard deviations in each of the five air-quality basins were significantly different from each other for the two-level approach method by the Waller-Duncan k-ratio t-test (k = 100, P = 0.05), suggesting that the two-level approach method is best among the three clustering methods. The clustering results of five air-quality basins in Taiwan are useful to decide the corresponding control strategy at different air-quality basins.(c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1452 / 1463
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Forecasting daily urban electric load profiles using artificial neural networks [J].
Beccali, M ;
Cellura, M ;
Lo Brano, V ;
Marvuglia, A .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 45 (18-19) :2879-2900
[2]   Modeling the effects of meteorology on ozone in Houston using cluster analysis and generalized additive models [J].
Davis, JM ;
Eder, BK ;
Nychka, D ;
Yang, Q .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 32 (14-15) :2505-2520
[3]  
Donaldson K, 1999, ISSUE ENV SCI TECHNO
[4]  
FERNAU ME, 1990, J APPL METEOROL, V29, P735, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029&lt
[5]  
0735:UOCATD&gt
[6]  
2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]   A comparison of self-organizing map algorithm and some conventional statistical methods for ecological community ordination [J].
Giraudel, JL ;
Lek, S .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2001, 146 (1-3) :329-339
[9]   FITTING STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTIONS TO AIR-QUALITY DATA BY THE MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD METHOD [J].
HOLLAND, DM ;
FITZSIMONS, T .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1982, 16 (05) :1071-1076
[10]   MODELING DISTRIBUTIONS OF AIR POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS .2. ESTIMATION OF ONE AND 2 PARAMETER STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTIONS [J].
JAKEMAN, AJ ;
TAYLOR, JA ;
SIMPSON, RW .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1986, 20 (12) :2435-2447