Efficacy and effectiveness as aspects of cluster randomized trials with nursing home residents: Methodological insights from a pneumonia prevention trial

被引:81
作者
Van Ness, Peter H. [1 ,2 ]
Peduzzi, Peter N. [3 ]
Quagliarello, Vincent J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Yale Program Aging, Geriatr Sect,Dept Internal Med, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Program Aging, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Biostat, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Infect Dis Sect, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cluster randomized clinical trials; Comparative effectiveness research; Nursing homes; Pneumonia; Biostatistics; HEALTH; OPPORTUNITIES; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; ATTITUDES; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.cct.2012.08.004
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
100103 [病原生物学]; 100218 [急诊医学];
摘要
This report discusses how methodological aspects of study efficacy and effectiveness combine in cluster randomized trials in nursing homes. Discussion focuses on the relationships between these study aspects in the Pneumonia Reduction in Institutionalized Disabled Elders (PRIDE) trial, an ongoing cluster randomized clinical trial of pneumonia prevention among nursing home residents launched in October 2009 in Greater New Haven, Connecticut. This clinical trial has enrolled long-term care nursing home residents, over 65 years in age, who have either inadequate oral care or swallowing difficulty, previously identified risk factors for pneumonia. It has used a multicomponent intervention consisting of manual tooth/gum brushing, 0.12% chlorhexidine oral rinse administered twice daily by nurses, and upright feeding positioning at meals to reduce rates of radiographically documented pneumonia. Cluster randomization is attractive for nursing home intervention studies because physical proximity and administrative arrangements make it difficult to deliver different interventions to residents of the same nursing home. Implementing an intervention in an entire home requires integration into the daily life of residents and into the administrative procedures of the nursing home. This characteristic of nursing home cluster randomized trials makes them approximate "real-world" research contexts, but implementation can be challenging. The PRIDE trial of pneumonia prevention utilized specific methodological choices that include both efficacy and effectiveness elements. Cluster randomized trials in nursing homes having elements of both efficacy and effectiveness (i.e., hybrid designs) can address some of the methodological challenges of conducting clinical research in nursing homes: they have distinctive advantages and some limitations. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1124 / 1131
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]
Recruitment of a rural, southern, predominantly African-American population into it diabetes self-management trial [J].
Andreae, Susan J. ;
Halanych, Jewell H. ;
Cherrington, Andrea ;
Safford, Monika M. .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2012, 33 (03) :499-506
[2]
[Anonymous], 1998, Fundamentals of clinical trials
[3]
[Anonymous], AG HEALTHC RES QUAL
[4]
[Anonymous], 2009, Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research
[5]
Armitage P, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2675
[6]
Hybrid research models: Natural opportunities for examining mental health in context [J].
Atkins, MS ;
Frazier, SL ;
Cappella, E .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2006, 13 (01) :105-108
[7]
Bridging the gap: A hybrid model to link efficacy and effectiveness research in substance abuse treatment [J].
Carroll, KM ;
Rounsaville, BJ .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2003, 54 (03) :333-339
[8]
Comparative-Effectiveness Research - Implications of the Federal Coordinating Council's Report [J].
Conway, Patrick H. ;
Clancy, Carolyn .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (04) :328-330
[9]
Donner A., 2010, Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials in health research
[10]
Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research, REP PRES C