Military return to duty and civilian return to work factors following burns with focus on the hand and literature review

被引:23
作者
Chapman, Ted T.
Richard, Reg L. [1 ]
Hedman, Travis L.
Chisholm, Gary B. [2 ]
Quick, Charles D.
Baer, David G.
Dewey, William S.
Jones, John S.
Renz, Evan M.
Barillo, David J.
Cancio, Leopold C.
Chung, Kevin K.
Holcomb, John B.
Wolf, Steven E.
机构
[1] USA, Inst Surg Res, ATTN MCMR USC PT, Ft Sam Houston, TX 78234 USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, San Antonio, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181848b41
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100602 [中西医结合临床];
摘要
Functional recovery and outcome from severe burns is oftentimes judged by the time required for a person to return to work (RTW) in civilian life. The equivalent in military terms is return to active duty. Many factors have been described in the literature as associated with this outcome. Hand function, in particular, is thought to have a great influence on the resumption of preburn activities. The purpose of this investigation was to compare factors associated with civilian RTW with combat injured military personnel. A review of the literature was performed to assimilate the many factors reported as involved with RTW or duty. Additionally, a focus on the influence of hand burns is included. Thirty-four different parameters influencing RTW have been reported inconsistently in the literature. In a military population of combat burns, TBSA burn, length of hospitalization and intensive care and inhalation injury were found as the most significant factors in determining return to duty status. In previous RTW investigations of civilian populations, there exists a scatter of factors reported to influence patient disposition with a mixture of conflicting results. In neither military nor civilian populations was the presence of a hand burn found as a dominant factor. Variety in patient information collected and statistical approaches used to analyze this information were found to influence the results and deter comparisons between patient populations. There is a need for a consensus data set and corresponding statistical approach used to evaluate RTW and duty outcomes after burn injury.
引用
收藏
页码:756 / 762
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
ACHTERBERG J, 1983, J BURN CARE REHABIL, V4, P437
[2]
BOWDEN ML, 1989, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V70, P772
[3]
Time off work and return to work rates after burns: Systematic review of the literature and a large two-center series [J].
Brych, SB ;
Engrav, LH ;
Rivara, FP ;
Ptacek, JT ;
Lezotte, DC ;
Esselman, PC ;
Kowalske, KJ ;
Gibran, NS .
JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & REHABILITATION, 2001, 22 (06) :401-405
[4]
BURN MORBIDITY - FOLLOWUP STUDY OF PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL DISABILITY [J].
CHANG, FC ;
HERZOG, B .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1976, 183 (01) :34-37
[5]
Cocchiarella L., 2001, GUIDES EVALUATION PE
[6]
Self-reported quality of life after electrical and thermal injury [J].
Cochran, A ;
Edelman, LS ;
Saffle, JR ;
Morris, SE .
JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & REHABILITATION, 2004, 25 (01) :61-66
[7]
Impairment after burns: a two-center, prospective report [J].
Costa, BA ;
Engrav, LH ;
Holavanahalli, R ;
Lezotte, DC ;
Patterson, DR ;
Kowalske, KJ ;
Esselman, PC .
BURNS, 2003, 29 (07) :671-675
[8]
COVEY MH, 1987, J BURN CARE REHABIL, V3, P224
[9]
Work status and burn specific health after work-related burn injury [J].
Dyster-Aas, J ;
Kildal, M ;
Willebrand, M ;
Gerdin, B ;
Ekselius, L .
BURNS, 2004, 30 (08) :839-842
[10]
EARLY EXCISION AND GRAFTING VS NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT OF BURNS OF INDETERMINANT DEPTH - A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
ENGRAV, LH ;
HEIMBACH, DM ;
REUS, JL ;
HARNAR, TJ ;
MARVIN, JA .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1983, 23 (11) :1001-1004