Correlation between MIB-1 and other proliferation markers -: Clinical implications of the MIB-1 cutoff value

被引:154
作者
Spyratos, F
Ferrero-Poüs, M
Trassard, M
Hacène, K
Phillips, E
Tubiana-Hulin, M
Le Doussal, V
机构
[1] Ctr Rene Huguenin, Lab Oncobiol, F-92210 St Cloud, France
[2] Ctr Rene Huguenin, Ctr Anat & Cytol Pathol, St Cloud, France
[3] Ctr Rene Huguenin, Dept Med Stat, St Cloud, France
[4] Ctr Rene Huguenin, Dept Biol, St Cloud, France
[5] Ctr Rene Huguenin, Dept Med, St Cloud, France
关键词
breast carcinoma; proliferation; MIB-1; cutoff;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.10458
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Cell proliferation is a major determinant of the biologic behavior of breast carcinoma. MIB-1 monoclonal antibody is a promising tool for determining cell proliferation on routine histologic material. The objectives of this study were to compare MIB-1 evaluation to other methods of measuring cell proliferation, with a view to refining the cutoff used to classify tumors with low and high proliferation rates in therapeutic trials. METHODS. One hundred eighty-five invasive breast carcinomas were evaluated for cell proliferation by determining monoclonal antibody MIB-1 staining, histologic parameters (Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade and mitotic index) on paraffin sections, S-phase fraction (SPF) by flow cytometry, and thymidine-kinase (TK) content of frozen samples. RESULTS. There was a high correlation (P = 0.0001) between the percentage of MIB-1 positive tumor cells and SPF, TIC, histologic grade, and the mitotic index. Multivariate analyses including MIB-1 at 5 different cutoffs (10%, 15%, 17% [median], 20%, 25%) and the other proliferative markers showed that the optimal MIB-1 cutoff was 25% and that the mitotic index was the proliferative variable that best discriminated between low and high MIB-1 samples. A MIB-1 cutoff of 25% adequately identified highly proliferative tumors. Conversely, with a MIB-1 cutoff of 10%, few tumors with low proliferation were misclassified. CONCLUSIONS. The choice of MIB-1 cutoff depends on the following clinical objective: if MIB-1 is used to exclude patients with slowly proliferating tumors from chemotherapeutic protocols, a cutoff of 10% will help to avoid overtreatment. In contrast, if MIB-1 is used to identify patients sensitive to chemotherapy protocols, it is preferable to set the cutoff at 25%. The MIB-1 index should be combined with some other routinely used proliferative markers, such as the mitotic index. (C) 2002 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:2151 / 2159
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Correlation among MIB-1, paraffin section proliferation index, and recurrence in low-stage breast carcinoma [J].
Arber, JM ;
Riggs, MW ;
Arber, DA .
APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY, 1997, 5 (02) :117-124
[2]   2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: Clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J].
Bast, RC ;
Ravdin, P ;
Hayes, DF ;
Bates, S ;
Fritsche, H ;
Jessup, JM ;
Kemeny, N ;
Locker, GY ;
Mennel, RG ;
Somerfield, MR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (06) :1865-1878
[3]   HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND PROGNOSIS IN BREAST CANCER - A STUDY OF 1409 CASES OF WHICH 359 HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED FOR 15 YEARS [J].
BLOOM, HJG ;
RICHARDSON, WW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1957, 11 (03) :359-&
[4]   Thymidine kinase as a proliferative marker:: Clinical relevance in 1,692 primary breast cancer patients [J].
Broët, P ;
Romain, S ;
Daver, A ;
Ricolleau, G ;
Quillien, V ;
Rallet, A ;
Asselain, B ;
Martin, PM ;
Spyratos, F .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (11) :2778-2787
[5]   S-phase fraction combined with other patient and tumor characteristics for the prognosis of node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer [J].
Bryant, J ;
Fisher, B ;
Gündüz, N ;
Costantino, JP ;
Emir, B .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1998, 51 (03) :239-253
[6]   MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES AGAINST RECOMBINANT PARTS OF THE KI-67 ANTIGEN (MIB-1 AND MIB-3) DETECT PROLIFERATING CELLS IN MICROWAVE-PROCESSED FORMALIN-FIXED PARAFFIN SECTIONS [J].
CATTORETTI, G ;
BECKER, MHG ;
KEY, G ;
DUCHROW, M ;
SCHLUTER, C ;
GALLE, J ;
GERDES, J .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1992, 168 (04) :357-363
[7]  
Chassevent A, 2001, CLIN CANCER RES, V7, P909
[8]   The utility of mitotic index, oestrogen receptor and Ki-67 measurements in the creation of novel prognostic indices for node-negative breast cancer [J].
Clahsen, PC ;
van de Velde, CJH ;
Duval, C ;
Pallud, C ;
Mandard, AM ;
Delobelle-Deroide, A ;
van den Broek, L ;
van de Vijver, MJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 25 (04) :356-363
[9]   Intratumoural heterogeneity of proliferation in invasive breast carcinoma evaluated with MIB1 antibody [J].
Connor, AJM ;
Pinder, SE ;
Elston, CW ;
Bell, JA ;
Wencyk, P ;
Robertson, JFR ;
Blamey, RW ;
Nicholson, RI ;
Ellis, IO .
BREAST, 1997, 6 (04) :171-176
[10]   Prognostic impact of proliferation associated factors MIBI (Ki-67) and S-phase in node-negative breast cancer [J].
Dettmar, P ;
Harbeck, N ;
Thomssen, C ;
Pache, L ;
Ziffer, P ;
Fizi, K ;
Janicke, F ;
Nathrath, W ;
Schmitt, M ;
Graeff, H ;
Hofler, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 75 (10) :1525-1533