Propofol sedation during awake craniotomy for seizures: Electrocorticographic and epileptogenic effects

被引:54
作者
Herrick, IA
Craen, RA
Gelb, AW
McLachlan, RS
Girvin, JP
Parrent, AG
Eliasziw, M
Kirkby, J
机构
[1] UNIV WESTERN ONTARIO,LONDON HLTH SCI CTR,JP ROBARTS RES INST,DEPT CLIN NEUROL SCI,LONDON,ON,CANADA
[2] UNIV WESTERN ONTARIO,LONDON HLTH SCI CTR,JP ROBARTS RES INST,DEPT EPIDEMIOL & BIOSTAT,LONDON,ON,CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199706000-00020
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
This prospective study evaluated the effects of propofol sedation on the incidence of intraoperative seizures and the adequacy of electrocorticographic (ECoG) recordings during awake craniotomy performed for the management of refractory epilepsy. Thirty patients scheduled for temporal or frontal lobectomy for epilepsy under bupivacaine scalp block were randomized to receive patient-controlled propofol sedation (PCS) combined with a basal infusion of propofol (rr = 15) or neurolept analgesia using an initial bolus dose of fentanyl (0.7 mu g/kg) and droperidol (0.04 mg/kg) followed by a fentanyl infusion (n = 15). Propofol administration was suspended 15 min before ECoG recording in the PCS group. The occurrence of inappropriate intraoperative seizures was noted and, based on blind review, the adequacy of ECoG recordings was compared. A higher incidence of intraoperative seizures was noted among the neurolept patients (6 vs 0, P = 0.008). Intraoperatively, ECoG recordings were adequate to proceed with resection in both groups. Evidence of low spike activity on ECoG did not correlate with the type of sedation administered. Higher frequency background ECoG activity was noted among patients who received propofol, but this did not interfere with ECoG interpretation. The use of propofol sedation does not appear to interfere with ECoG during epilepsy surgery, provided administration is suspended at least 15 min before recording.
引用
收藏
页码:1280 / 1284
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   CONSCIOUS-SEDATION ANALGESIA DURING CRANIOTOMY FOR INTRACTABLE EPILEPSY - A REVIEW OF 354 CONSECUTIVE CASES [J].
ARCHER, DP ;
MCKENNA, JMA ;
MORIN, L ;
RAVUSSIN, P .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1988, 35 (04) :338-344
[2]  
BALDESSARINI RJ, 1985, PHARMACOL BASIS THER, P396
[3]  
*CAN PHARM ASS, 1996, COMP PHARM SPEC, P666
[4]   MASKING OF EPILEPTIFORM ACTIVITY BY PROPOFOL DURING SEIZURE SURGERY [J].
DRUMMOND, JC ;
IRAGUIMADOZ, VJ ;
ALKSNE, JF ;
KALKMAN, CJ .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (04) :652-654
[5]   THE EFFECT OF PROPOFOL ON THE ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM OF PATIENTS WITH EPILEPSY [J].
EBRAHIM, ZY ;
SCHUBERT, A ;
VANNESS, P ;
WOLGAMUTH, B ;
AWAD, I .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1994, 78 (02) :275-279
[6]   COMPARISON OF FENTANYL, SUFENTANIL AND ALFENTANIL DURING AWAKE CRANIOTOMY FOR EPILEPSY [J].
GIGNAC, E ;
MANNINEN, PH ;
GELB, AW .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1993, 40 (05) :421-424
[7]   NEUROSURGICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND GENERAL-METHODS FOR CRANIOTOMY UNDER LOCAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
GIRVIN, JP .
INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS, 1986, 24 (03) :89-114
[8]  
HERRICK IA, 1997, TXB NEUROANESTHESIA, P615
[9]  
HODKINSON BP, 1987, LANCET, V2, P1518
[10]   PROPOFOL INFUSION FOR CONTROL OF STATUS EPILEPTICUS [J].
MACKENZIE, SJ ;
KAPADIA, F ;
GRANT, IS .
ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 45 (12) :1043-1045