Patent portfolio diversity, technology strategy, and firm value

被引:162
作者
Lin, BW [1 ]
Chen, CJ
Wu, HL
机构
[1] Natl Tsing Hua Univ, Inst Technol Management, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Business Adm, Tainan 701, Taiwan
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
patent portfolio; strategy; synergy; technology diversity;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2005.861813
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates how the composition and diversity of a firm's patent portfolio can create synergy and, thus, contribute to firm performance. To resolve two conflicting views on whether technology diversity or strategic. focus can improve firm performance, we develop a scheme to measure the diversity of a patent portfolio at the two levels of broad technology diversity and core field diversity. In our framework, both views can be valid. The former argument is effective when the focal firm has very high technology stocks and profitability is used as a performance measure. The latter is true for a focal firm with above average technology stocks and where shareholder value is considered as a performance indicator. This paper highlights technology stocks as a moderator between the relationship of technology diversity and firm performance. Generally, a firm without very high-technology stocks should concentrate its R&D resources on a specific technology field, and even within the core technology field the firm should stay focus on a small number of core technologies. Results support the competence-based view of the firm. Technology-based firms should develop a portfolio with a clear technology focus. This study lays the groundwork for future study on the interrelationships of technology strategy, patent portfolio, and long-term performance.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 26
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions
[2]  
AMIT R, 1988, ACAD MANAGE J, V31, P154, DOI 10.5465/256502
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1983, STRATEG MANAG
[4]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[5]  
BETTIS RA, 1982, ACAD MANAGE J, V25, P254, DOI 10.5465/255989
[6]   CORPORATE-MERGERS, STOCKHOLDER DIVERSIFICATION, AND CHANGES IN SYSTEMATIC-RISK [J].
CHATTERJEE, S ;
LUBATKIN, M .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1990, 11 (04) :255-268
[7]   CORPORATE ECONOMIC-PERFORMANCE - DIVERSIFICATION STRATEGY VERSUS MARKET-STRUCTURE [J].
CHRISTENSEN, HK ;
MONTGOMERY, CA .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1981, 2 (04) :327-343
[8]   A SIMPLE APPROXIMATION OF TOBINS-Q [J].
CHUNG, KH ;
PRUITT, SW .
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 1994, 23 (03) :70-74
[9]   CORPORATE FOCUS AND STOCK RETURNS [J].
COMMENT, R ;
JARRELL, GA .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 37 (01) :67-87
[10]  
DeCarolis DM, 1999, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V20, P953, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199910)20:10<953::AID-SMJ59>3.0.CO