The role of ERCP in diagnosis and management of accessory bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy

被引:70
作者
Mergener, K
Strobel, JC
Suhocki, P
Jowell, PS
Enns, RA
Branch, MS
Baillie, J
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Med, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70077-5
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) plays an important role in the management of bile leaks after cholecystectomy. Although most leaks occur from the cystic duct stump, clinically significant leakage from accessory bile ducts is less common and has not been investigated systematically. We report our experience with endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of accessory bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy. Methods: Patients with accessory bile duct leaks were identified from a computerized database. Hospital charts and cholangiograms were reviewed to determine the outcome of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Results: Of 86 patients with postcholecystectomy leaks, 15 (17%) were diagnosed with accessory bile duct leaks. ERCP established the diagnosis of accessory bile duct leaks in II of 15 patients (73%); percutaneous fistulography (2) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (2) were diagnostic in 4 patients. Endoscopic therapy led to resolution of the leak in 12 patients. One patient underwent successful percutaneous biliary drainage, and two patients required surgical repair. Conclusions: Accessory bile ducts are rare sites of significant bile leakage after cholecystectomy. ERCP identifies the leak in the majority of patients; percutaneous fistulography or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography may help clarify the diagnosis if ERCP is nondiagnostic. Most patients can be successfully treated with endoscopic stenting. If endoscopic therapy fails, percutaneous drainage or surgical repair needs to be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 531
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
ALBASINI JLA, 1995, SURG ENDOSC-ULTRAS, V9, P1274
[2]   LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - EXPERIENCE WITH 375 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS [J].
BAILEY, RW ;
ZUCKER, KA ;
FLOWERS, JL ;
SCOVILL, WA ;
GRAHAM, SM ;
IMBEMBO, AL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1991, 214 (04) :531-541
[3]   Postcholecystectomy biliary leaks in the laparoscopic era: Risk factors, presentation, and management [J].
Barkun, AN ;
Rezieg, M ;
Mehta, SN ;
Pavone, E ;
Landry, S ;
Barkun, JS ;
Fried, GM ;
Bret, P ;
Cohen, A .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 45 (03) :277-282
[4]  
BINMOELLER KF, 1991, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V86, P227
[5]   MANAGEMENT OF BILE LEAKS FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
BROOKS, DC ;
BECKER, JM ;
CONNORS, PJ ;
CARRLOCKE, DL .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1993, 7 (04) :292-295
[6]   THE CYSTOHEPATIC DUCTS - SURGICAL IMPLICATIONS [J].
CHAMPETIER, J ;
LETOUBLON, C ;
ALNAASAN, I ;
CHARVIN, B .
SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 1991, 13 (03) :203-211
[7]   POSTOPERATIVE BILE LEAKAGE - ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT [J].
DAVIDS, PHP ;
RAUWS, EAJ ;
TYTGAT, GNJ ;
HUIBREGTSE, K .
GUT, 1992, 33 (08) :1118-1122
[8]   BILE LEAK FROM THE LIVER BED FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
EDELMAN, DS .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1994, 8 (03) :205-207
[9]   SIGNIFICANCE OF POST-CHOLECYSTECTOMY SUBHEPATIC FLUID COLLECTIONS [J].
ELBOIM, CM ;
GOLDMAN, L ;
HANN, L ;
PALESTRANT, AM ;
SILEN, W .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1983, 198 (02) :137-141
[10]   SURGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ABERRANT BILE DUCTS [J].
FOSTER, JH ;
WAYSON, EE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1962, 104 (01) :14-19