A resource for benchmarking the usefulness of protein structure models

被引:2
作者
Carbajo, Daniel [1 ]
Tramontano, Anna [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Phys, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[2] Inst Pasteur Fdn Cenci Bolognetti, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Ist Italiano Tecnol, Ctr Life Nanosci Sapienza, I-00185 Rome, Italy
来源
BMC BIOINFORMATICS | 2012年 / 13卷
关键词
Protein structure prediction; Decoy database; Comparative modeling; ModelDB; DATA-BANK; SEQUENCE; PREDICTION; DISCOVERY; RESIDUES;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2105-13-188
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Increasingly, biologists and biochemists use computational tools to design experiments to probe the function of proteins and/or to engineer them for a variety of different purposes. The most effective strategies rely on the knowledge of the three-dimensional structure of the protein of interest. However it is often the case that an experimental structure is not available and that models of different quality are used instead. On the other hand, the relationship between the quality of a model and its appropriate use is not easy to derive in general, and so far it has been analyzed in detail only for specific application. Results: This paper describes a database and related software tools that allow testing of a given structure based method on models of a protein representing different levels of accuracy. The comparison of the results of a computational experiment on the experimental structure and on a set of its decoy models will allow developers and users to assess which is the specific threshold of accuracy required to perform the task effectively. Conclusions: The ModelDB server automatically builds decoy models of different accuracy for a given protein of known structure and provides a set of useful tools for their analysis. Pre-computed data for a non-redundant set of deposited protein structures are available for analysis and download in the ModelDB database.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Large-scale assessment of the utility of low-resolution protein structures for biochemical function assignment [J].
Arakaki, AK ;
Zhang, Y ;
Skolnick, J .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 20 (07) :1087-1096
[2]   The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its new supplement TREMBL [J].
Bairoch, A ;
Apweiler, R .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1996, 24 (01) :21-25
[3]   Analysis of catalytic residues in enzyme active sites [J].
Bartlett, GJ ;
Porter, CT ;
Borkakoti, N ;
Thornton, JM .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2002, 324 (01) :105-121
[4]   An integrated in silico 3D model-driven discovery of a novel, potent, and selective amidosulfonamide 5-HT1A agonist (PRX-00023) for the treatment of anxiety and depression [J].
Becker, Oren M. ;
Dhanoa, Dale S. ;
Marantz, Yael ;
Chen, Dongli ;
Shacham, Sharon ;
Cheruku, Srinivasa ;
Heifetz, Alexander ;
Mohanty, Pradyumna ;
Fichman, Merav ;
Sharadendu, Anurag ;
Nudelman, Raphael ;
Kauffman, Michael ;
Noiman, Silvia .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 49 (11) :3116-3135
[5]   PROTEIN DATA BANK - COMPUTER-BASED ARCHIVAL FILE FOR MACROMOLECULAR STRUCTURES [J].
BERNSTEIN, FC ;
KOETZLE, TF ;
WILLIAMS, GJB ;
MEYER, EF ;
BRICE, MD ;
RODGERS, JR ;
KENNARD, O ;
SHIMANOUCHI, T ;
TASUMI, M .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1977, 112 (03) :535-542
[6]   Q-Dock: Low-resolution flexible ligand docking with pocket-specific threading restraints [J].
Brylinski, Michal ;
Skolnick, Jeffrey .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2008, 29 (10) :1574-1588
[7]   THE RELATION BETWEEN THE DIVERGENCE OF SEQUENCE AND STRUCTURE IN PROTEINS [J].
CHOTHIA, C ;
LESK, AM .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1986, 5 (04) :823-826
[8]   In silico pharmacology for drug discovery:: applications to targets and beyond [J].
Ekins, S. ;
Mestres, J. ;
Testa, B. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 152 (01) :21-37
[9]   Modeling of loops in protein structures [J].
Fiser, A ;
Do, RKG ;
Sali, A .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2000, 9 (09) :1753-1773
[10]   Evaluating the usefulness of protein structure models for molecular replacement [J].
Giorgetti, A ;
Raimondo, D ;
Miele, AE ;
Tramontano, A .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 21 :72-76