Improving Communication of Uncertainty in the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

被引:245
作者
Budescu, David V. [1 ]
Broomell, Stephen [1 ]
Por, Han-Hui [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
VERBAL PROBABILITIES; BASE RATE; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02284.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assesses information relevant to the understanding of climate change and explores options for adaptation and mitigation. The IPCC reports communicate uncertainty by using a set of probability terms accompanied by global interpretational guidelines. The judgment literature indicates that there are large differences in the way people understand such phrases, and that their use may lead to confusion and errors in communication. We conducted an experiment in which subjects read sentences from the 2007 IPCC report and assigned numerical values to the probability terms. The respondents' judgments deviated significantly from the IPCC guidelines, even when the respondents had access to these guidelines. These results suggest that the method used by the IPCC is likely to convey levels of imprecision that are too high. We propose an alternative form of communicating uncertainty, illustrate its effectiveness, and suggest several additional ways to improve the communication of uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 308
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Structural and process history of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [J].
Agrawala, S .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1998, 39 (04) :621-642
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, GUID NOT LEAD AUTH I
[3]  
Begley Sharon, 2007, Newsweek, V150, P20
[4]   HOW PROBABLE IS PROBABLE - A NUMERICAL TRANSLATION OF VERBAL PROBABILITY-EXPRESSIONS [J].
BEYTHMAROM, R .
JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1982, 1 (03) :257-269
[5]   VERBAL PROBABILITIES - AMBIGUOUS, CONTEXT-DEPENDENT, OR BOTH [J].
BRUN, W ;
TEIGEN, KH .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1988, 41 (03) :390-404
[6]  
Budescu D.V., 1995, DECISION MAKING COGN, P275, DOI [10.1016/S0079-7421, DOI 10.1016/S0079-7421]
[7]  
Budescu D.V., 1987, JUDGMENTAL FORECASTI, P63
[8]   CONSISTENCY IN INTERPRETATION OF PROBABILISTIC PHRASES [J].
BUDESCU, DV ;
WALLSTEN, TS .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1985, 36 (03) :391-405
[9]   DYADIC DECISIONS WITH NUMERICAL AND VERBAL PROBABILITIES [J].
BUDESCU, DV ;
WALLSTEN, TS .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1990, 46 (02) :240-263
[10]   Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale [J].
Dunlap, RE ;
Van Liere, KD ;
Mertig, AG ;
Jones, RE .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2000, 56 (03) :425-442