Relationship of dose of background angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor to the benefits of candesartan in the candesartan in heart failure:: Assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM)-Added trial

被引:38
作者
McMurray, JJV [1 ]
Young, JB
Dunlap, ME
Granger, CB
Hainer, J
Michelson, EL
Earle, S
Olofsson, B
Östergren, J
Yusuf, S
Swedberg, K
Pfeffer, MA
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Western Infirm, Dept Cardiol, Glasgow G11 6NT, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] VA Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH USA
[5] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[6] AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE USA
[7] AstraZeneca R&D, Molndal, Sweden
[8] Karolinska Univ, Hosp Solna, Dept Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[9] HGM McMaster Clin, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[10] Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Gothenburg, Sweden
[11] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2006.02.028
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Whether an angiotensin receptor blocker is of benefit when added to a full dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor in heart failure (HF) is uncertain. Methods The effect of candesartan, compared with placebo, in 2548 patients randomized in the CHARM-Added trial was analyzed according to (i) ACE inhibitor dose at baseline, (ii) ACE inhibitor dose during follow-up, and (iii) combination treatment with ACE inhibitor and beta-blocker at baseline. The main outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. Results The benefit of candesartan was not modified by the dose of ACE inhibitor. In all patients (n = 2548), the candesartan/placebo hazard ratio (HR) for the primary outcome was 0.85 (95% Cl 0.75-0.96). In patients taking a guideline recommended dose of ACE inhibitor at baseline (n = 129 1), this HR was 0.79 (95% Cl 0.67-0.95; interaction P value .26). In patients taking a Food and Drug Administration-designated maximum dose of ACE inhibitor (n = 529), this HR was 0.75 (95% Cl 0.57-0.98; interaction P value .29). The benefit of candesartan was preserved in patients taking beta-blockers in addition to a higher dose of ACE inhibitor and in patients maintaining a high dose of ACE inhibitor throughout follow-up. Conclusions These clinical findings support the pharmacologic evidence that ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers have distinct mechanisms of action and show that their combined use improves outcomes in patients with HF more than an evidence-based dose of ACE inhibitor alone.
引用
收藏
页码:985 / 991
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Rationale for the use of combination angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy in heart failure
    Carson, PE
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 140 (03) : 361 - 366
  • [2] A COMPARISON OF ENALAPRIL WITH HYDRALAZINE ISOSORBIDE DINITRATE IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC CONGESTIVE-HEART-FAILURE
    COHN, JN
    JOHNSON, G
    ZIESCHE, S
    COBB, F
    FRANCIS, G
    TRISTANI, F
    SMITH, R
    DUNKMAN, WB
    LOEB, H
    WONG, ML
    BHAT, G
    GOLDMAN, S
    FLETCHER, RD
    DOHERTY, J
    HUGHES, CV
    CARSON, P
    CINTRON, G
    SHABETAI, R
    HAAKENSON, C
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 325 (05) : 303 - 310
  • [3] Effects of controlled-release metoprolol on total mortality, hospitalizations, and well-being in patients with heart failure -: The metoprolol CR/XL randomized intervention trial in congestive heart failure (MERIT-HF)
    Hjalmarson, Å
    Goldstein, S
    Fagerberg, B
    Wedel, H
    Waagstein, F
    Kjekshus, J
    Wikstrand, J
    El Allaf, D
    Vítovec, J
    Aldershvile, J
    Halinen, M
    Dietz, R
    Neuhaus, KL
    Jánosi, A
    Thorgeirsson, G
    Dunselman, PHJM
    Gullestad, L
    Kuch, J
    Herlitz, J
    Rickenbacher, P
    Ball, S
    Gottlieb, S
    Deedwania, P
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (10): : 1295 - 1302
  • [4] Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function taking angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors:: the CHARM-Added trial
    McMurray, JJV
    Östergren, J
    Swedberg, K
    Granger, CB
    Held, P
    Michelson, EL
    Olofsson, B
    Yusuf, S
    Pfeffer, MA
    [J]. LANCET, 2003, 362 (9386) : 767 - 771
  • [5] Outcome of patients with congestive heart failure treated with standard versus high doses of enalapril: A multicenter study
    Nanas, JN
    Alexopoulos, G
    Anastasiou-Nana, MI
    Karidis, K
    Tirologos, A
    Zobolos, S
    Pirgakis, V
    Anthopoulos, L
    Sideris, D
    Stamarelopoulos, SF
    Moulopoulos, SD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 36 (07) : 2090 - 2095
  • [6] Comparison of omapatrilat chronic and enalapril in patients with heart failure - The omapatrilat versus enalapril randomized trial of utility in reducing events (OVERTURE)
    Packer, M
    Califf, RM
    Konstam, MA
    Krum, H
    McMurray, JJ
    Rouleau, JL
    Swedberg, K
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (08) : 920 - 926
  • [7] The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure
    Pitt, B
    Zannad, F
    Remme, WJ
    Cody, R
    Castaigne, A
    Perez, A
    Palensky, J
    Wittes, J
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (10) : 709 - 717
  • [8] The benefits of early combination treatment of carvedilol and an ACE-inhibitor in mild heart failure and left ventricular Systolic dysfunction.: The carvedilol and ACE-inhibitor remodelling mild heart failure evaluation trial (CARMEN)
    Remme, WJ
    Riegger, G
    Hildebrandt, P
    Komajda, M
    Jaarsma, W
    Bobbio, M
    Soler-Soler, J
    Scherhag, A
    Lutiger, B
    Rydén, L
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY, 2004, 18 (01) : 57 - 66
  • [9] Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure
    Remme, WJ
    Swedberg, K
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (17) : 1527 - 1560
  • [10] SWEDBERG K, 1987, NEW ENGL J MED, V316, P1429