Dose comparison of single versus double dose in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries: intra-individual cross-over blinded trial using Gd-DTPA

被引:10
作者
Heverhagen, J. T. [1 ,2 ]
Wright, C. L. [1 ]
Schmalbrock, P. [1 ]
Knopp, M. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Radiol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Univ Marburg, Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Marburg, Germany
关键词
Magnetic resonance angiography; Renal arteries; Contrast agent; Intraindividual comparison; MR-ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPLICATIONS; STENOSIS; MEDIA; DSA;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-008-1120-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This study was planned as an open-label, single-centre trial with blinded evaluations by two independent radiologists, aimed at the intra-individual comparison of single-dose and double-dose Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRA in the renal arterial territory. Ten healthy volunteers were included in the study. Renal MRAs were carried out on a clinical 1.5-T MR system using a body phased-array coil. Images were acquired with three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient echo sequence. Contrast agent was injected with a power injector keeping the injection time constant for single dose and double dose. Both readers found at least 96% of vascular segments evaluable. Median overall image quality was rated excellent, and diagnostic confidence was rated confident. No statistically significant difference between the dosage groups could be demonstrated. Signal intensity, SNR and CNR were significantly higher for the double-dose group. Our results demonstrate that while a double dose of contrast agent increases SNR, it does not lead to further improvement in visual and perceptual image quality. A single dosage of approximately 0.1 mmol/kg bw Gd-DTPA may be the preferable dosage to demonstrate the renal arteries.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 72
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media [J].
Cochran, ST ;
Bomyea, K ;
Sayre, JW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (06) :1385-1388
[2]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
DUMOULIN, CL ;
HART, HR .
RADIOLOGY, 1986, 161 (03) :717-720
[3]   MR ANGIOGRAPHY AND DYNAMIC FLOW EVALUATION OF THE PORTAL VENOUS SYSTEM [J].
EDELMAN, RR ;
ZHAO, B ;
LIU, C ;
WENTZ, KU ;
MATTLE, HP ;
FINN, JP ;
MCARDLE, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1989, 153 (04) :755-760
[4]  
Frayne R, 2000, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V12, P476, DOI 10.1002/1522-2586(200009)12:3<476::AID-JMRI14>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-F
[6]  
Grist TM, 2000, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V11, P32, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(200001)11:1<32::AID-JMRI5>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-W
[8]   Noise measurement and estimation in MR imaging experiments [J].
Heverhagen, Johannes T. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 245 (03) :638-639
[9]   The impact of the dosage of intravenous gadolinium-chelates on the vascular signal intensity in MR angiography [J].
Heverhagen, Johannes T. ;
Reitz, Isabelle ;
Pavlicova, Martina ;
Levine, Andrea L. ;
Klose, Klaus J. ;
Wagner, Hans-Joachim .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (03) :626-637
[10]   Kinetic evaluation of an IV bolus of MR contrast media [J].
Heverhagen, JT ;
Funck, RC ;
Schwarz, U ;
Zoefel, P ;
Matschl, V ;
Klose, KJ ;
Wagner, HJ .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 19 (07) :1025-1030