Trait psychology and culture: Exploring intercultural comparisons

被引:187
作者
McCrae, RR [1 ]
机构
[1] NIA, Gerontol Res Ctr, Lab Personal & Cognit, NIH, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-6494.696166
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Personality traits, studied for decades by Western personality psychologists, have recently been reconceptualized as endogenous basic tendencies that, within a cultural context, give rise to habits, attitudes, skills, beliefs, and other characteristic adaptations. This conceptualization provides a new framework for studying personality and culture at three levels. Transcultural research focuses on identifying human universals, such as trait structure and development; intracultural studies examine the unique expression of traits in specific cultures; and intercultural research characterizes cultures and their subgroups in terms of mean levels of personality traits and seeks associations between cultural variables and aggregate personality traits. As an example of the problems and possibilities of intercultural analyses, data on mean levels of Revised NEO Personality Inventory scales from college age and adult samples (N = 23,031) of men and women from 26 cultures are examined. Results showed that age and gender differences resembled those found in American samples; different subsamples from each culture showed similar levels of personality traits; intercultural factor analysis yielded a close approximation to the Five-Factor Model; and factor scores were meaningfully related to other culture-level variables. However, mean trait levels were not apparent to expert raters, casting doubt on the accuracy of national stereotypes. Trait psychology can serve as a useful complement to cultural perspectives on human nature and personality.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 846
页数:28
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Avia M.D., Sanz J., Sanchez-Bernardos M.L., Version Espanola del Inventario de Personalidad NEO Revisado (NEO-PI-R) de Paul T. Costa Y Robert R. McCrae (1992). Edition Experimental, (1999)
  • [2] Barrett P., Eysenck S., The assessment of personality factors across 25 countries, Personality and Individual Differences, 5, pp. 615-632, (1984)
  • [3] Benet-Martinez V., John O.P., Measuring Los Cinco Grandes in Spain with indigenous Castilian markers, American Behavioral Scientist, 44, pp. 141-157, (2000)
  • [4] Bock P.K., Culture and personality revisited, American Behavioral Scientist, 44, pp. 32-40, (2000)
  • [5] Bond M.H., Surveying the foundations: Approaches to measuring group, organizational, and national variation, Work Motivation in the Context of a Globalizing Economy
  • [6] Butcher J.N., International Adaptations of the MMPI-2: A Handbook of Research and Clinical Applications, (1996)
  • [7] Cassaretto M., Adaptacion del Inventario de Personalidad NEO Revisado (NEO-PI-R) Forma S en Un Grupo de Estudiantes Universitarios [adaptation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory in a Sample of University Students], (1999)
  • [8] Cattell R.B., Personality: A Systematic Theoretical and Factual Study, (1950)
  • [9] Cattell R.B., Personality and Mood by Questionnaire, (1973)
  • [10] Chen M.C., Psychosocial Correlates of Prosocial Behavior among College Students in Taiwan, (1996)