WEAP21 - A demand-, priority-, and preference-driven water planning model Part 1: Model characteristics

被引:498
作者
Yates, D [1 ]
Sieber, J
Purkey, D
Huber-Lee, A
机构
[1] IWRA, Stockholm Environm Inst, Boston, MA USA
[2] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[3] Natl Heritage Inst, Sacramento, CA USA
[4] Stockholm Environm Inst, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国国家环境保护局; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Integrated Water Resources Management; physical hydrology; decision support systems; priorities; preferences and equity groups;
D O I
10.1080/02508060508691893
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The Water Evaluation and Planning Version 21 (WEAP21) Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) model seamlessly integrates water supplies generated through watershed-scale hydrologic processes with a water management model driven by water demands and environmental requirements and is governed by the natural watershed and physical network of reservoirs, canals, and diversions. This version (WEAP21) extends the previous WEAP model by introducing the concept Of demand priorities and supply preferences, which are used in a linear programming heuristic to solve the water allocation problem as an alternative to multi-criteria weighting or rule-based logic approaches. WEAP21 introduces a transparent set of model objects and procedures that can be used to analyze a full range of issues faced by water planners through a scenario-based approach. These issues include climate variability and change, watershed condition, anticipated demands, ecosystem needs, the regulatory environment, operational objectives, and available infrastructure.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 500
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[2]   A COMPREHENSIVE SURFACE-GROUNDWATER FLOW MODEL [J].
ARNOLD, JG ;
ALLEN, PM ;
BERNHARDT, G .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1993, 142 (1-4) :47-69
[3]  
BERKELAAR M, 2004, LP SOLVE MIXED INTEG
[4]   Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response modelling system [J].
Beven, K .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2002, 16 (02) :189-206
[5]   INTEGRATED WATER MANAGEMENT - SOME INTERNATIONAL DIMENSIONS [J].
BISWAS, AK .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1981, 51 (1-4) :369-379
[6]   Integrated water management: emerging issues and challenges [J].
Bouwer, H .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2000, 45 (03) :217-228
[7]   Water management in a mountain front recharge aquifer [J].
Burness, S ;
Chermak, J ;
Brookshire, D .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2004, 40 (06) :W06S211-W06S2111
[8]  
Chapra S.C, 1997, SURFACE WATER QUALIT
[9]  
Chapra SC., 1998, NUMERICAL METHODS EN
[10]   Potential impacts of climate change on groundwater recharge and streamflow in a central European low mountain range [J].
Eckhardt, K ;
Ulbrich, U .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2003, 284 (1-4) :244-252