Anatomic Predictors of Formation of Lower Caliceal Calculi: Is It the Time for Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Urography?

被引:10
作者
El-Assmy, Ahmed [1 ]
Abo-Elghar, Mohamed E. [2 ]
El-Nahas, Ahmed R. [1 ]
Youssef, Ramy F. [1 ]
El-Diasty, Tarek [2 ]
Sheir, Khaled Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Urol & Nephrol Ctr, Dept Urol, Mansoura, Egypt
[2] Mansoura Univ, Urol & Nephrol Ctr, Dept Radiol, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2008.0148
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the various anatomic factors, using computed tomography urography (CTU), that predispose to a lower-pole kidney stone formation on one side compared with the other. Materials and Methods: The study included 51 patients with a solitary lower- pole stone. Lower-pole infundibulopelvic angle (IPA), infundibular width (IW), infundibular length (IL), caliceal volume (CV), and number of minor calices of the affected lower calyx and normal contralateral kidney were measured based on CTU. The IPA was measured according to the methods of Sampaio and Elbahnasy. A comparison was made using multivariate analysis to determine whether any of these measurements predisposed one side to form stones. Results: The mean IPA was 80.9 degrees (Sampaio), and 52.3 degrees (Elbahnasy) on the affected kidney and 87.5 degrees (P = 0.39) and 54 degrees (P = 0.36) on the normal side. The mean IW was 2.6 mm on affected side and 3.15 mm on the normal side (P = 0.03). The mean IL was 19.7 mm and 15.3 mm (P < 0.001) on the affected and normal kidneys, respectively. Mean CV was 1123 mm(3) on affected side and 286 mm3 on the normal side (P < 0.001). The mean number of minor calices was comparable (n = 3) on both sides with no statistical significance. Using multivariate analysis, only caliceal volume and IW sustained their significance in the final model. Conclusions: CTU is a very useful imaging modality in the diagnosis of intrarenal anatomic variation. Larger caliceal volume and narrower IW are associated with stone formation in lower calyx.
引用
收藏
页码:2175 / 2179
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Is pelvicaliceal anatomy a risk factor for stone formation in patients with solitary upper caliceal stone? [J].
Acar, Cenk ;
Kupeli, Bora ;
Gurocak, Serhat ;
Alkibay, Turgut ;
Guneri, Cagri ;
Ozkan, Secil ;
Bozkiri, Ibrahim .
UROLOGY, 2006, 67 (06) :1159-1163
[2]  
Bagley D H, 1987, Surg Endosc, V1, P119, DOI 10.1007/BF00312699
[3]  
Drach G W, 1999, Curr Opin Urol, V9, P101, DOI 10.1097/00042307-199903000-00002
[4]   Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: The impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy [J].
Elbahnasy, AM ;
Shalhav, AL ;
Hoenig, DM ;
Elashry, OM ;
Smith, DS ;
McDougall, EM ;
Clayman, RV .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (03) :676-682
[5]   Effect of lower infundibulopelvic angle, lower infundibulum diameter and inferior calyceal length on stone formation [J].
Gökalp, A ;
Tahmaz, L ;
Peskircioglu, L ;
Özgök, Y ;
Saglam, M ;
Kibar, Y ;
Harmankaya, AÇ .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1999, 63 (02) :107-109
[6]   Renal anatomical factors for the lower calyceal stone formation [J].
Gozen, A. Serdar ;
Kilic, A. Serkan ;
Aktoz, Tevfik ;
Akdere, Hakan .
INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 38 (01) :79-85
[7]   Pelvicaliceal anatomical variation between stone bearing and normal contralateral kidneys - Does it have an impact on stone formation in pediatric patients with a solitary lower caliceal stone? [J].
Gurocak, S ;
Kupeli, B ;
Acar, C ;
Guneri, C ;
Tan, MO ;
Bozkirli, I .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (01) :270-275
[8]   The effect of helical pitch and beam collimation on the lesion contrast and slice profile in helical CT imaging [J].
Hu, H ;
Fox, SH .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (12) :1943-1954
[9]  
Keeley FX, 1999, EUR UROL, V36, P371
[10]  
Kupeli Bora, 2006, Int. braz j urol., V32, P287, DOI 10.1590/S1677-55382006000300005